Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SWFCX vs TRIGX
SWFCX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts SWFCX vs TRIGX
Touchstone International Value C
Price$16.90
Change+$0.16 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets116.25M
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$22.06
Change+$0.08 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16B
SWFCX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SWFCX vs. TRIGX commentary
Aug 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SWFCX is a Buy and TRIGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16B vs. SWFCX (116M). SWFCX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: SWFCX (2.66) vs TRIGX (2.05). SWFCX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: SWFCX (27 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). SWFCX (2.85) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). SWFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). SWFCX (2500) and TRIGX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.66 vs. SWFCX (23.24). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 99.21 vs. SWFCX (29.35).
| SWFCX | TRIGX | SWFCX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.87 | 214% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.85 | 0.87 | 328% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.294 | 29.370 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 116M | 16B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.66 | 2.05 | 130% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.24 | 29.66 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.81 | 74.04 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.35 | 99.21 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.14 | 79.46 | 10% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement