TFC
Price
$53.10
Change
+$0.11 (+0.21%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
64.87B
61 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
USB
Price
$65.42
Change
+$0.25 (+0.38%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
101.93B
60 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

TFC vs USB

TFC vs USB Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
TFC vs. USB commentary
Aug 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TFC is a StrongBuy and USB is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2026
Stock price -- (TFC: $53.10 vs. USB: $65.42)
Brand notoriety: TFC: Not notable vs. USB: Notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: TFC: 55% vs. USB: 51%
Market capitalization -- TFC: $64.87B vs. USB: $101.93B
TFC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $64.87B. USB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $101.93B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.57B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

TFC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUSB’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • TFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • USB’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, USB is a better buy in the long-term than TFC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TFC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while USB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • TFC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • USB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TFC is a better buy in the short-term than USB.

Price Growth

TFC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.44% price change this week, while USB (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

TFC is expected to report earnings on Oct 16, 2026.

USB is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.33% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
USB($102B) has a higher market cap than TFC($64.9B). USB has higher P/E ratio than TFC: USB (13.06) vs TFC (12.21). USB YTD gains are higher at: 24.927 vs. TFC (11.236). TFC has less debt than USB: TFC (69.9B) vs USB (79.2B). USB has higher revenues than TFC: USB (28.9B) vs TFC (20.8B).
TFCUSBTFC / USB
Capitalization64.9B102B64%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD11.23624.92745%
P/E Ratio12.2113.0693%
Revenue20.8B28.9B72%
Total Cash4.71BN/A-
Total Debt69.9B79.2B88%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TFC vs USB: Fundamental Ratings
TFC
USB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8341
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7658
SMR RATING
1..100
65
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3718
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4933
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TFC's Valuation (22) in the null industry is in the same range as USB (46) in the Major Banks industry. This means that TFC’s stock grew similarly to USB’s over the last 12 months.

USB's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as TFC (76) in the null industry. This means that USB’s stock grew similarly to TFC’s over the last 12 months.

USB's SMR Rating (5) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as TFC (6) in the null industry. This means that USB’s stock grew similarly to TFC’s over the last 12 months.

USB's Price Growth Rating (18) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as TFC (37) in the null industry. This means that USB’s stock grew similarly to TFC’s over the last 12 months.

USB's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as TFC (49) in the null industry. This means that USB’s stock grew similarly to TFC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TFCUSB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
TFC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
USB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CORZ20.180.40
+2.02%
Core Scientific
CEPO10.690.02
+0.19%
Cantor Equity Partners I Inc
ISRG394.51-6.76
-1.68%
Intuitive Surgical
BEEM1.13-0.02
-1.74%
Beam Global
LSPD10.67-0.29
-2.65%
Lightspeed Commerce

TFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TFC has been closely correlated with RF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TFC jumps, then RF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TFC
1D Price
Change %
TFC100%
+1.20%
RF - TFC
87%
Closely correlated
+0.76%
KEY - TFC
87%
Closely correlated
+1.39%
FITB - TFC
86%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
MTB - TFC
85%
Closely correlated
+0.33%
CFG - TFC
84%
Closely correlated
+0.84%
More

USB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, USB has been closely correlated with PNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if USB jumps, then PNC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To USB
1D Price
Change %
USB100%
+0.38%
PNC - USB
91%
Closely correlated
+0.69%
MTB - USB
85%
Closely correlated
+0.33%
CFG - USB
85%
Closely correlated
+0.84%
FITB - USB
85%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
TFC - USB
84%
Closely correlated
+1.20%
More