TFC
Price
$49.97Alerts
Change
+$0.08 (+0.16%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
60.32B
67 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
USB
Price
$60.99Alerts
Change
+$0.52 (+0.86%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
92.63B
66 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

TFC vs USB

TFC vs USB Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Oct 20, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Truist Financial Corporation (TFC) vs. U.S. Bancorp (USB) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Truist Financial Corporation (TFC) and U.S. Bancorp (USB) are two major U.S. regional banking franchises with overlapping but distinct business mixes.
  • Both beat third-quarter 2025 earnings estimates, but USB posted sharper year-over-year earnings growth (up roughly 18%) than TFC.
  • TFC is executing a balance-sheet reset—selling its subprime auto portfolio and repositioning securities—which created a one-time hit to reported earnings but is intended to improve recurring income.
  • USB has shown stronger expense discipline and broader fee-income diversification, including a sizable payments business.
  • Both carry a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold), while analyst upgrades and price-target increases signal improving sentiment around TFC.
  • On a market-positioning basis, USB is the larger and more diversified institution, while TFC skews toward a faster loan-growth and fee-recovery narrative.

Introduction

Regional banks sit at the intersection of interest-rate dynamics, credit quality, and the health of the U.S. consumer and commercial borrower. For investors evaluating this segment, TFC and USB offer a useful stock comparison because they represent two large franchises taking different paths through the current rate environment. Both have delivered improving fundamentals in recent quarters, yet their relative performance and market positioning differ meaningfully. This comparison is most relevant for traders and long-term investors weighing diversification, fee-income exposure, and capital-return potential among major regional banks.

TFC Overview and Recent Performance

TFC is Truist Financial Corporation, a Charlotte, North Carolina-based bank formed through the 2019 merger of BB&T and SunTrust. In its most recent quarter, the company reported adjusted earnings of $1.04 per share, ahead of consensus, on total revenue of $5.19 billion. Net interest income (NII)—the revenue a bank earns from lending versus what it pays on deposits—rose modestly, while fee income climbed more than 5% on gains in mortgage banking, wealth management, and investment banking.

A defining feature of recent weeks has been a deliberate balance-sheet repositioning. Management sold its Regional Acceptance Corporation subprime auto portfolio and sold lower-yielding mortgage-backed securities, taking a one-time loss to reinvest at higher yields. This suppressed reported earnings in the period but is intended to lift recurring income going forward. The move also reduced nonperforming loans and freed up capital. Analysts responded constructively, with at least one firm upgrading the stock to Buy and citing an "inflection point." Return on average tangible common equity (ROTCE), a key profitability measure, improved sequentially to 13.6%.

USB Overview and Recent Performance

USB is U.S. Bancorp, the Minneapolis-based parent of U.S. Bank, one of the nation's largest financial-services holding companies. In its latest quarter, the bank reported earnings of $1.22 per share, up about 18% year over year, on revenue of $7.33 billion—an increase of roughly 7%. Net interest income grew about 2%, while non-interest income jumped roughly 14%, reflecting strength across most fee categories and a well-established payments platform.

Recent performance has been characterized by disciplined cost control and improving efficiency. Non-interest expenses declined year over year, and the efficiency ratio—a measure of how much it costs to generate each dollar of revenue—improved to 57.2% from 60.2% a year earlier. Credit quality also improved, with non-performing assets down about 10% year over year. Despite these solid results, the stock has lagged the broader market and regional-bank peers over the trailing year, and at least one large sell-side firm maintained a cautious rating, underscoring mixed sentiment around valuation and growth momentum.

Trending AI Robots

For traders seeking a systematic approach to names like TFC and USB, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated view of its AI-powered trading bots. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI Trading Bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, but only the strongest and best-suited strategies for current market conditions earn a place in this section. Each bot operates with its own trading style, timeframe, strategy, performance history, and basket of tickers—meaning two bots can approach the same stock in very different ways. The page highlights bots with notable statistical track records, helping users identify tools aligned with their own risk tolerance and time horizon. Explore the Trending AI Robots section to review available performance data and find a bot that fits your approach.

Head-to-Head Comparison

While both institutions are major regional banks, their business models and growth drivers diverge in important ways. USB is the larger and more diversified franchise, with a nationally recognized payments business that provides a steadier stream of non-interest income and somewhat less reliance on loan spreads. TFC is comparatively more concentrated in traditional banking and has leaned into a faster loan-growth and fee-recovery strategy, including a planned expansion of roughly 100 new branches.

On momentum, TFC has generated more positive analyst attention in recent weeks, driven by its restructuring story and sequential improvement in ROTCE. USB, by contrast, has demonstrated more consistent expense discipline and a cleaner earnings trajectory, yet its shares have underperformed both the S&P 500 and regional-bank peers over the past year. Risk profiles also differ: TFC carries a slightly higher Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) capital ratio—a measure of a bank's core capital strength—while USB has shown improving credit metrics and a lower net charge-off trend.

Tickeron AI Verdict

On observable factors, Tickeron's AI would likely view both names favorably but tilt toward TFC on relative positioning. The company's trend appears more clearly defined by a coherent restructuring catalyst, accelerating loan growth, and a sequence of analyst upgrades that suggest improving sentiment. USB offers greater diversification and steadier fee income, but its relative underperformance and mixed analyst ratings suggest momentum has yet to align with its fundamentals. This assessment is probabilistic rather than definitive: the AI's preference would depend on the specific strategy, timeframe, and risk profile selected, and conditions can shift with changes in interest rates, credit quality, and broader market sentiment.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
TFC vs. USB commentary
Nov 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TFC is a Buy and USB is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
A.I.Advisor
a Summary for TFC with price predictions
Nov 13, 2026

TFC in upward trend: price rose above 50-day moving average on October 29, 2026

TFC moved above its 50-day moving average on October 29, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend. In 36 of 41 similar past instances, the stock price increased further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 88%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where TFC's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 14 of 23 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 61%.

The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 20, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on TFC as a result. In 48 of 82 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 59%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for TFC just turned positive on October 12, 2026. Looking at past instances where TFC's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 26 of 43 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 60%.

The 10-day moving average for TFC crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on November 02, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 11 of 14 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 79%.

Following a +1.01% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where TFC advanced for three days, in 199 of 322 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 62%.

The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 128 of 255 cases where TFC Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 50%.

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 42 of 63 cases where TFC's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 67%.

The 50-day moving average for TFC moved below the 200-day moving average on October 16, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where TFC declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 62%.

TFC broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 20, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 5 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 36 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.028) is normal, around the industry mean (1.262). P/E Ratio (11.197) is within average values for comparable stocks, (13.479). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.066) is also within normal values, averaging (1.190). Dividend Yield (0.042) settles around the average of (0.036) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (2.954) is also within normal values, averaging (3.738).

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 46 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. TFC’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 56 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 96 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. TFC’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 56, placing this stock worse than average.

A.I.Advisor
a Summary for USB with price predictions
Nov 13, 2026

USB sees its Stochastic Oscillator ascends from oversold territory

On November 10, 2026, the Stochastic Oscillator for USB moved out of oversold territory and this could be a bullish sign for the stock. Traders may want to buy the stock or buy call options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 62 instances where the indicator left the oversold zone. In 42 of the 62 cases the stock moved higher in the following days. This puts the odds of a move higher at over 68%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where USB's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 15 of 28 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 54%.

The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on November 13, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on USB as a result. In 54 of 91 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 59%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for USB just turned positive on October 12, 2026. Looking at past instances where USB's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 26 of 44 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 59%.

USB moved above its 50-day moving average on November 02, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.

The 10-day moving average for USB crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on November 02, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 9 of 14 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 64%.

Following a +0.27% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where USB advanced for three days, in 176 of 302 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 58%.

The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 157 of 297 cases where USB Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 53%.

Bearish Trend Analysis

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where USB declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 61%.

USB broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 22, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 4 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 32 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 44 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. USB’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 67 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.528) is normal, around the industry mean (1.262). P/E Ratio (11.866) is within average values for comparable stocks, (13.479). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.773) is also within normal values, averaging (1.190). Dividend Yield (0.036) settles around the average of (0.036) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (3.141) is also within normal values, averaging (3.738).

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 70 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. USB’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 56, placing this stock worse than average.

FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TFC vs USB: Fundamental Ratings
TFC
USB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8984
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9670
SMR RATING
1..100
54
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4644
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5632
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TFC's Valuation (36) in the null industry is in the same range as USB (67) in the Major Banks industry. This means that TFC’s stock grew similarly to USB’s over the last 12 months.

USB's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as TFC (96) in the null industry. This means that USB’s stock grew similarly to TFC’s over the last 12 months.

USB's SMR Rating (4) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as TFC (5) in the null industry. This means that USB’s stock grew similarly to TFC’s over the last 12 months.

USB's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as TFC (46) in the null industry. This means that USB’s stock grew similarly to TFC’s over the last 12 months.

USB's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as TFC (56) in the null industry. This means that USB’s stock grew similarly to TFC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TFCUSB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2026
Stock price -- (TFC: $49.97 vs. USB: $60.99)
Brand notoriety: TFC: Not notable vs. USB: Notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: TFC: 61% vs. USB: 49%
Market capitalization -- TFC: $60.32B vs. USB: $92.63B
TFC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $60.32B. USB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $92.63B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $147.87 to $173.74B. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

TFC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while USB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • TFC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • USB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, TFC is a better buy in the long-term than USB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TFC’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while USB’s TA Score has 8 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • TFC’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • USB’s TA Score: 8 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, USB is a better buy in the short-term than TFC.

Price Growth

TFC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.26% price change this week, while USB (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.77%.

Reported Earning Dates

TFC is expected to report earnings on Jan 20, 2027.

USB is expected to report earnings on Jan 19, 2027.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.00% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement

TFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TFC has been closely correlated with USB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TFC jumps, then USB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TFC
1D Price
Change %
TFC100%
+1.22%
USB - TFC
88%
Closely correlated
+0.86%
RF - TFC
88%
Closely correlated
+1.23%
PNC - TFC
86%
Closely correlated
+0.55%
FITB - TFC
85%
Closely correlated
+1.11%
MTB - TFC
85%
Closely correlated
+0.61%
More

USB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, USB has been closely correlated with PNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if USB jumps, then PNC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To USB
1D Price
Change %
USB100%
+0.86%
PNC - USB
88%
Closely correlated
+0.55%
TFC - USB
88%
Closely correlated
+1.22%
CFG - USB
87%
Closely correlated
+0.62%
MTB - USB
86%
Closely correlated
+0.61%
FITB - USB
86%
Closely correlated
+1.11%
More
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GAUZ5.660.35
+6.59%
Gauzy Ltd
ALNY165.048.39
+5.36%
Alnylam Pharmaceuticals
CAAS4.470.20
+4.68%
China Automotive Systems
AESI5.570.07
+1.27%
Atlas Energy Solutions
HIW31.070.14
+0.45%
Highwoods Properties