TFC
Price
$38.78
Change
-$0.07 (-0.18%)
Updated
Apr 24, 6:59 PM EST
89 days until earnings call
USB
Price
$41.63
Change
+$0.65 (+1.59%)
Updated
Apr 24, 6:59 PM EST
84 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

Analysis and predictions TFC vs USB

Header iconTFC vs USB Comparison
Open Charts TFC vs USBBanner chart's image
Truist Financial
Price$38.78
Change-$0.07 (-0.18%)
Volume$2.37M
CapitalizationN/A
US Ban
Price$41.63
Change+$0.65 (+1.59%)
Volume$2.09M
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
TFC vs USB Comparison Chart

Loading...

TFCDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
USBDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
VS
TFC vs. USB commentary
Apr 25, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TFC is a Hold and USB is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 25, 2024
Stock price -- (TFC: $38.84 vs. USB: $40.97)
Brand notoriety: TFC: Not notable vs. USB: Notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: TFC: 114% vs. USB: 86%
Market capitalization -- TFC: $52.02B vs. USB: $68.49B
TFC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $52.02B. USB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $68.49B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

TFC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUSB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • TFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • USB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, USB is a better buy in the long-term than TFC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TFC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while USB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • TFC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • USB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TFC is a better buy in the short-term than USB.

Price Growth

TFC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +8.98% price change this week, while USB (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.14%.

Reported Earning Dates

TFC is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2024.

USB is expected to report earnings on Jul 17, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.71% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for TFC with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for USB with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
USB($68.5B) has a higher market cap than TFC($52B). USB has higher P/E ratio than TFC: USB (13.44) vs TFC (7.93). TFC YTD gains are higher at: 6.742 vs. USB (-4.260). TFC has less debt than USB: TFC (59.7B) vs USB (62.9B). USB has higher revenues than TFC: USB (28B) vs TFC (23.4B).
TFCUSBTFC / USB
Capitalization52B68.5B76%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD6.742-4.260-158%
P/E Ratio7.9313.4459%
Revenue23.4B28B84%
Total Cash5.07BN/A-
Total Debt59.7B62.9B95%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TFC vs USB: Fundamental Ratings
TFC
USB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7054
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
61
Fair valued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9793
SMR RATING
1..100
32
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
2647
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7920
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TFC's Valuation (61) in the null industry is in the same range as USB (75) in the Major Banks industry. This means that TFC’s stock grew similarly to USB’s over the last 12 months.

USB's Profit vs Risk Rating (93) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as TFC (97) in the null industry. This means that USB’s stock grew similarly to TFC’s over the last 12 months.

USB's SMR Rating (2) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as TFC (3) in the null industry. This means that USB’s stock grew similarly to TFC’s over the last 12 months.

TFC's Price Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is in the same range as USB (47) in the Major Banks industry. This means that TFC’s stock grew similarly to USB’s over the last 12 months.

USB's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TFC (79) in the null industry. This means that USB’s stock grew somewhat faster than TFC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TFCUSB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
TFCDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
USBDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DLX20.480.66
+3.33%
Deluxe Corp
PI123.683.41
+2.84%
Impinj
STT74.39-0.12
-0.16%
State Street Corp
IONR5.06-0.14
-2.68%
ioneer Ltd
MTR10.08-0.28
-2.70%
Mesa Royalty Trust