TFC
Price
$43.63
Change
+$0.36 (+0.83%)
Updated
Oct 14, 02:59 PM (EDT)
3 days until earnings call
USB
Price
$47.01
Change
+$0.75 (+1.62%)
Updated
Oct 14, 03:07 PM (EDT)
2 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

TFC vs USB

Header iconTFC vs USB Comparison
Open Charts TFC vs USBBanner chart's image
Truist Financial
Price$43.63
Change+$0.36 (+0.83%)
Volume$17.38K
CapitalizationN/A
US Ban
Price$47.01
Change+$0.75 (+1.62%)
Volume$18.83K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
TFC vs USB Comparison Chart
Loading...
TFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
USB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
TFC vs. USB commentary
Oct 14, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TFC is a Buy and USB is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 14, 2024
Stock price -- (TFC: $43.26 vs. USB: $46.26)
Brand notoriety: TFC: Not notable vs. USB: Notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: TFC: 217% vs. USB: 130%
Market capitalization -- TFC: $52.02B vs. USB: $68.49B
TFC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $52.02B. USB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $68.49B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

TFC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUSB’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • TFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • USB’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, USB is a better buy in the long-term than TFC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TFC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while USB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • TFC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • USB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, USB is a better buy in the short-term than TFC.

Price Growth

TFC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.05% price change this week, while USB (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.82%.

Reported Earning Dates

TFC is expected to report earnings on Jan 17, 2025.

USB is expected to report earnings on Jan 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.91% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
USB($68.5B) has a higher market cap than TFC($52B). USB has higher P/E ratio than TFC: USB (13.44) vs TFC (7.93). TFC YTD gains are higher at: 21.987 vs. USB (10.671). TFC has less debt than USB: TFC (59.7B) vs USB (62.9B). USB has higher revenues than TFC: USB (28B) vs TFC (23.4B).
TFCUSBTFC / USB
Capitalization52B68.5B76%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD21.98710.671206%
P/E Ratio7.9313.4459%
Revenue23.4B28B84%
Total Cash5.07BN/A-
Total Debt59.7B62.9B95%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TFC vs USB: Fundamental Ratings
TFC
USB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5084
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9492
SMR RATING
1..100
33
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
2123
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8522
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9595

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TFC's Valuation (58) in the null industry is in the same range as USB (75) in the Major Banks industry. This means that TFC’s stock grew similarly to USB’s over the last 12 months.

USB's Profit vs Risk Rating (92) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as TFC (94) in the null industry. This means that USB’s stock grew similarly to TFC’s over the last 12 months.

USB's SMR Rating (3) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as TFC (3) in the null industry. This means that USB’s stock grew similarly to TFC’s over the last 12 months.

TFC's Price Growth Rating (21) in the null industry is in the same range as USB (23) in the Major Banks industry. This means that TFC’s stock grew similarly to USB’s over the last 12 months.

USB's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TFC (85) in the null industry. This means that USB’s stock grew somewhat faster than TFC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TFCUSB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
TFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
USB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPY579.583.45
+0.60%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME20.83-0.08
-0.38%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X62851.375000-341.648440
-0.54%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
AAPL227.55-1.49
-0.65%
Apple
TSLA217.80-20.97
-8.78%
Tesla

TFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TFC has been closely correlated with CFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TFC jumps, then CFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TFC
1D Price
Change %
TFC100%
+1.81%
CFG - TFC
85%
Closely correlated
+3.17%
FITB - TFC
83%
Closely correlated
+2.74%
USB - TFC
83%
Closely correlated
+2.94%
PNC - TFC
82%
Closely correlated
+2.40%
HBAN - TFC
82%
Closely correlated
+2.87%
More

USB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, USB has been closely correlated with FITB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if USB jumps, then FITB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To USB
1D Price
Change %
USB100%
+2.94%
FITB - USB
86%
Closely correlated
+2.74%
CFG - USB
84%
Closely correlated
+3.17%
HBAN - USB
84%
Closely correlated
+2.87%
TFC - USB
83%
Closely correlated
+1.81%
PNC - USB
82%
Closely correlated
+2.40%
More