TGB
Price
$3.44
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
626.06M
3 days until earnings call
WRSLF
Price
$0.12
Change
-$0.02 (-14.29%)
Updated
Jul 23 closing price
Capitalization
204.1M
Interact to see
Advertisement

TGB vs WRSLF

Header iconTGB vs WRSLF Comparison
Open Charts TGB vs WRSLFBanner chart's image
Taseko Mines
Price$3.44
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.16M
Capitalization626.06M
Winsome Resources
Price$0.12
Change-$0.02 (-14.29%)
Volume$44.6K
Capitalization204.1M
TGB vs WRSLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
TGB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WRSLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
TGB vs. WRSLF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TGB is a Hold and WRSLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (TGB: $3.44 vs. WRSLF: $0.12)
Brand notoriety: TGB and WRSLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: TGB: 29% vs. WRSLF: 186%
Market capitalization -- TGB: $626.06M vs. WRSLF: $204.1M
TGB [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $626.06M. WRSLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $204.1M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

TGB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWRSLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • TGB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WRSLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TGB is a better buy in the long-term than WRSLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TGB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WRSLF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • TGB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WRSLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WRSLF is a better buy in the short-term than TGB.

Price Growth

TGB (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +6.83% price change this week, while WRSLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -4.84% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.73%.

Reported Earning Dates

TGB is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.12% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TGB($626M) has a higher market cap than WRSLF($204M). TGB YTD gains are higher at: 77.320 vs. WRSLF (-54.972). TGB has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 125M vs. WRSLF (-10.63M). TGB has more cash in the bank: 83.5M vs. WRSLF (13.5M).
TGBWRSLFTGB / WRSLF
Capitalization626M204M307%
EBITDA125M-10.63M-1,176%
Gain YTD77.320-54.972-141%
P/E Ratio10.57N/A-
Revenue472MN/A-
Total Cash83.5M13.5M619%
Total Debt707MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TGB: Fundamental Ratings
TGB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
84
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
24
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
37
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
97
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TGBWRSLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
81%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
TGB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WRSLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WMIDX11.940.16
+1.36%
WCM Mid Cap Quality Value Investor
AVEMX28.110.21
+0.75%
Ave Maria Value
FTCWX13.860.01
+0.07%
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 20% C
GIEZX16.60-0.01
-0.06%
GuideStone Funds International Eq Inv
PGIUX15.79-0.01
-0.06%
Virtus Duff & Phelps Global Infras I

TGB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TGB has been closely correlated with HBM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TGB jumps, then HBM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TGB
1D Price
Change %
TGB100%
N/A
HBM - TGB
74%
Closely correlated
-2.47%
SCCO - TGB
71%
Closely correlated
-1.30%
FCX - TGB
71%
Closely correlated
+0.70%
LUNMF - TGB
69%
Closely correlated
-0.83%
TECK - TGB
69%
Closely correlated
-6.04%
More

WRSLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WRSLF and EMX have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WRSLF and EMX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WRSLF
1D Price
Change %
WRSLF100%
N/A
EMX - WRSLF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.97%
TGB - WRSLF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLCNF - WRSLF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.88%
ERDCF - WRSLF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.40%
CTTZF - WRSLF
22%
Poorly correlated
-7.79%
More