Ad is loading...
TIHRF
Price
$0.94
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 31 closing price
TSGZF
Price
$0.08
Change
+$0.01 (+14.29%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

TIHRF vs TSGZF

Header iconTIHRF vs TSGZF Comparison
Open Charts TIHRF vs TSGZFBanner chart's image
Tharisa
Price$0.94
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10K
CapitalizationN/A
TriStar Gold
Price$0.08
Change+$0.01 (+14.29%)
Volume$1.5K
CapitalizationN/A
TIHRF vs TSGZF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
TIHRF vs. TSGZF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TIHRF is a Hold and TSGZF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (TIHRF: $0.94 vs. TSGZF: $0.08)
Brand notoriety: TIHRF and TSGZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: TIHRF: 75% vs. TSGZF: 2%
Market capitalization -- TIHRF: $305.43M vs. TSGZF: $24.06M
TIHRF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $305.43M. TSGZF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $24.06M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

TIHRF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTSGZF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • TIHRF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TSGZF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, TIHRF is a better buy in the long-term than TSGZF.

Price Growth

TIHRF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TSGZF (@Precious Metals) price change was -12.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -2.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.75%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-2.07% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TIHRF($305M) has a higher market cap than TSGZF($24.1M). TSGZF has higher P/E ratio than TIHRF: TSGZF (34.01) vs TIHRF (2.45). TIHRF YTD gains are higher at: 31.904 vs. TSGZF (25.505). TIHRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 213M vs. TSGZF (-2.18M). TIHRF has more cash in the bank: 204M vs. TSGZF (4.03M). TIHRF has higher revenues than TSGZF: TIHRF (687M) vs TSGZF (0).
TIHRFTSGZFTIHRF / TSGZF
Capitalization305M24.1M1,266%
EBITDA213M-2.18M-9,790%
Gain YTD31.90425.505125%
P/E Ratio2.4534.017%
Revenue687M0-
Total Cash204M4.03M5,068%
Total Debt93MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TSGZF: Fundamental Ratings
TSGZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
89
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
63
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
96
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PHIN52.370.27
+0.52%
PHINIA
YRD5.84-0.08
-1.35%
Yiren Digital Ltd
NOW1011.39-28.41
-2.73%
SERVICENOW
NYT52.46-1.76
-3.25%
New York Times Co
FLUX2.19-0.19
-7.98%
Flux Power Holdings

TIHRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TIHRF and TSGZF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TIHRF and TSGZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TIHRF
1D Price
Change %
TIHRF100%
N/A
TSGZF - TIHRF
23%
Poorly correlated
+12.08%
EFRGF - TIHRF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLGCF - TIHRF
3%
Poorly correlated
-8.20%
PPTA - TIHRF
3%
Poorly correlated
+16.48%
AUGG - TIHRF
2%
Poorly correlated
+2.65%
More

TSGZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TSGZF and TIHRF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TSGZF and TIHRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TSGZF
1D Price
Change %
TSGZF100%
+12.08%
TIHRF - TSGZF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ARMN - TSGZF
7%
Poorly correlated
-2.00%
UGDIF - TSGZF
3%
Poorly correlated
-7.65%
THMG - TSGZF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TNGMF - TSGZF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More