It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
TKLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVRM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
TKLF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VRM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
TKLF (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -34.16% price change this week, while VRM (@Specialty Stores) price change was -44.04% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -2.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.03%.
TKLF is expected to report earnings on Mar 24, 2023.
VRM is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2024.
The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
TKLF | VRM | TKLF / VRM | |
Capitalization | 10.6M | 24.1M | 44% |
EBITDA | N/A | -276M | - |
Gain YTD | -62.038 | -89.668 | 69% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 13.28 | - |
Revenue | N/A | 893M | - |
Total Cash | N/A | 140M | - |
Total Debt | N/A | 1.23B | - |
TKLF | VRM | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago87% | 3 days ago66% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago75% | 3 days ago83% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 3 days ago89% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago79% | 4 days ago86% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago87% | 3 days ago90% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago86% | 3 days ago90% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago81% | 13 days ago77% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago90% | 3 days ago90% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago79% | 3 days ago77% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago86% | 3 days ago90% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that TKLF and NAAS have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TKLF and NAAS's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TKLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
TKLF | 100% | -24.43% | ||
NAAS - TKLF | 22% Poorly correlated | +2.83% | ||
BGFV - TKLF | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.82% | ||
RH - TKLF | 20% Poorly correlated | -2.21% | ||
VRM - TKLF | 20% Poorly correlated | -24.09% | ||
ODP - TKLF | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.75% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VRM has been loosely correlated with HNST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VRM jumps, then HNST could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VRM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
VRM | 100% | -24.09% | ||
HNST - VRM | 41% Loosely correlated | +6.31% | ||
CPRT - VRM | 40% Loosely correlated | -1.17% | ||
CVNA - VRM | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.23% | ||
LE - VRM | 32% Poorly correlated | -4.41% | ||
LOW - VRM | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.35% | ||
More |