LE
Price
$12.05
Change
+$0.43 (+3.70%)
Updated
Jul 7 closing price
Capitalization
370.43M
50 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VRM
Price
$7.71
Change
+$0.18 (+2.39%)
Updated
Jul 7 closing price
Capitalization
40.12M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LE vs VRM

LE vs VRM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LE vs. VRM commentary
Jul 08, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LE is a StrongBuy and VRM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 08, 2026
Stock price -- (LE: $11.62 vs. VRM: $7.52)
Brand notoriety: LE and VRM are both not notable
LE represents the Apparel/Footwear Retail, while VRM is part of the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LE: 72% vs. VRM: 32%
Market capitalization -- LE: $370.43M vs. VRM: $40.12M
LE [@Apparel/Footwear Retail] is valued at $370.43M. VRM’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $40.12M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Apparel/Footwear Retail] industry ranges from $179.95B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $669.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Apparel/Footwear Retail] industry is $9.69B. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $33.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LE’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVRM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VRM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LE is a better buy in the long-term than VRM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LE’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VRM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LE’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • VRM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LE is a better buy in the short-term than VRM.

Price Growth

LE (@Apparel/Footwear Retail) experienced а +10.88% price change this week, while VRM (@Savings Banks) price change was -2.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear Retail industry was -2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.45%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was +2.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

LE is expected to report earnings on Aug 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Apparel/Footwear Retail (-2.12% weekly)

Companies in the apparel and/or footwear retail industry sell clothing, accessories and footwear, for different age groups and genders. The industry’s product categories could range from basics, such as underwear, to luxury items. Some retailers source items from wholesalers or an apparel brand to sell in their stores; some others are licensed to make and market their own retail goods under particular brands. Several companies outsource production of clothing to developing/emerging economies where labor costs are relatively inexpensive. Apparel retail is often influenced by fashion trends, and many companies feel the need to adapt to what’s “in vogue” to retain customers and attract new ones. A major disruption in this industry has been the burgeoning trend in digital shopping – to compete with rapidly growing e-commerce, even traditional retail players are upping the ante on their online platforms. Much of the products’ performance in apparel/footwear retail is cyclical, i.e., economic boom times encourage consumer spending, while recessions induce thriftiness among people. Some large-cap U.S. apparel/footwear retail companies include TJX Companies Inc., Ross Stores, Inc., Lululemon Athletica Inc. and Burlington Stores, Inc.

@Savings Banks (+2.18% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LE($370M) has a higher market cap than VRM($40.1M). LE YTD gains are higher at: -19.972 vs. VRM (-62.173). LE has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 74.6M vs. VRM (-7.22M). LE has more cash in the bank: 17.7M vs. VRM (14.5M). LE has less debt than VRM: LE (246M) vs VRM (775M). LE has higher revenues than VRM: LE (1.34B) vs VRM (6.91M).
LEVRMLE / VRM
Capitalization370M40.1M923%
EBITDA74.6M-7.22M-1,033%
Gain YTD-19.972-62.17332%
P/E Ratio1.02N/A-
Revenue1.34B6.91M19,309%
Total Cash17.7M14.5M122%
Total Debt246M775M32%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LE vs VRM: Fundamental Ratings
LE
VRM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2789
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9099
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7291
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10074
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LE's Valuation (37) in the Internet Retail industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VRM (84) in the null industry. This means that LE’s stock grew somewhat faster than VRM’s over the last 12 months.

LE's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Internet Retail industry is in the same range as VRM (100) in the null industry. This means that LE’s stock grew similarly to VRM’s over the last 12 months.

LE's SMR Rating (90) in the Internet Retail industry is in the same range as VRM (99) in the null industry. This means that LE’s stock grew similarly to VRM’s over the last 12 months.

LE's Price Growth Rating (72) in the Internet Retail industry is in the same range as VRM (91) in the null industry. This means that LE’s stock grew similarly to VRM’s over the last 12 months.

VRM's P/E Growth Rating (74) in the null industry is in the same range as LE (100) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that VRM’s stock grew similarly to LE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LEVRM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VRM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EPSRX28.790.03
+0.10%
NYLI Epoch Global Equity Yield Class R6
CAMSX19.35N/A
N/A
Cambiar Small Cap Inv
FNKLX18.95N/A
N/A
Fidelity Series Value Discovery
GKIRX28.60N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Income Builder Inv
NIEAX18.82N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon International Equity A

LE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LE has been loosely correlated with CAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LE jumps, then CAL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LE
1D Price
Change %
LE100%
N/A
CAL - LE
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.27%
ASO - LE
46%
Loosely correlated
N/A
WSM - LE
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.60%
SPWH - LE
46%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SBH - LE
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.34%
More

VRM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VRM has been loosely correlated with HNST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VRM jumps, then HNST could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VRM
1D Price
Change %
VRM100%
N/A
HNST - VRM
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CPRT - VRM
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NNI - VRM
33%
Loosely correlated
-1.16%
CVNA - VRM
33%
Poorly correlated
-4.11%
LE - VRM
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More