TMOAF vs UBSFY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TMOAF is a Hold and UBSFY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
TMOAF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUBSFY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- TMOAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- UBSFY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
UBSFY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- UBSFY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
TMOAF (@Packaged Software) experienced а -6.02% price change this week, while UBSFY (@Packaged Software) price change was +3.74% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.92%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+1.14% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| TMOAF | UBSFY | TMOAF / UBSFY | |
| Capitalization | 1.13B | 4.21B | 27% |
| EBITDA | 31.5M | 899M | 4% |
| Gain YTD | -14.691 | -42.351 | 35% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 39.37 | - |
| Revenue | 573M | 2.11B | 27% |
| Total Cash | 316M | 1.53B | 21% |
| Total Debt | 50.2M | 2.2B | 2% |
TMOAF | UBSFY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 97 | 11 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 66 Overvalued | 57 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | 96 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 65 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | 93 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
UBSFY's Valuation (57) in the null industry is in the same range as TMOAF (66). This means that UBSFY’s stock grew similarly to TMOAF’s over the last 12 months.
UBSFY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as TMOAF (100). This means that UBSFY’s stock grew similarly to TMOAF’s over the last 12 months.
TMOAF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as UBSFY (96). This means that TMOAF’s stock grew similarly to UBSFY’s over the last 12 months.
TMOAF's Price Growth Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as UBSFY (65). This means that TMOAF’s stock grew similarly to UBSFY’s over the last 12 months.
UBSFY's P/E Growth Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as TMOAF (99). This means that UBSFY’s stock grew similarly to TMOAF’s over the last 12 months.
| UBSFY | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% |
TMOAF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMOAF has been loosely correlated with MTC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TMOAF jumps, then MTC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TMOAF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMOAF | 100% | N/A | ||
| MTC - TMOAF | 47% Loosely correlated | -9.74% | ||
| SFSVF - TMOAF | 37% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| NEWUF - TMOAF | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| URLOF - TMOAF | 6% Poorly correlated | +1.59% | ||
| UBSFY - TMOAF | 5% Poorly correlated | +4.48% | ||
More | ||||
UBSFY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UBSFY has been loosely correlated with UBSFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UBSFY jumps, then UBSFF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UBSFY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UBSFY | 100% | +4.48% | ||
| UBSFF - UBSFY | 59% Loosely correlated | +3.88% | ||
| PLUS - UBSFY | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.37% | ||
| MTHRY - UBSFY | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.70% | ||
| AMPL - UBSFY | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.45% | ||
| REKR - UBSFY | 25% Poorly correlated | -2.59% | ||
More | ||||