TNGMF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
TSGZF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.02 (-25.00%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
Ad is loading...

TNGMF vs TSGZF

Header iconTNGMF vs TSGZF Comparison
Open Charts TNGMF vs TSGZFBanner chart's image
TGX ENERGY & RES
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1K
CapitalizationN/A
TriStar Gold
Price$0.06
Change-$0.02 (-25.00%)
Volume$116K
CapitalizationN/A
TNGMF vs TSGZF Comparison Chart
Loading...
TNGMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TSGZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
TNGMF vs. TSGZF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TNGMF is a Hold and TSGZF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (TNGMF: $0.05 vs. TSGZF: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: TNGMF and TSGZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: TNGMF: 13% vs. TSGZF: 171%
Market capitalization -- TNGMF: $817.94K vs. TSGZF: $24.06M
TNGMF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $817.94K. TSGZF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $24.06M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

TNGMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTSGZF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • TNGMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TSGZF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, TNGMF is a better buy in the long-term than TSGZF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TNGMF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TSGZF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • TNGMF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • TSGZF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TNGMF is a better buy in the short-term than TSGZF.

Price Growth

TNGMF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TSGZF (@Precious Metals) price change was -13.51% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.01%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.24% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TSGZF($24.1M) has a higher market cap than TNGMF($818K). TSGZF has higher P/E ratio than TNGMF: TSGZF (34.01) vs TNGMF (12.19). TNGMF YTD gains are higher at: 59.667 vs. TSGZF (-0.467). TNGMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -150.13K vs. TSGZF (-2.18M). TSGZF has more cash in the bank: 4.03M vs. TNGMF (698K). TNGMF (0) and TSGZF (0) have equivalent revenues.
TNGMFTSGZFTNGMF / TSGZF
Capitalization818K24.1M3%
EBITDA-150.13K-2.18M7%
Gain YTD59.667-0.467-12,789%
P/E Ratio12.1934.0136%
Revenue00-
Total Cash698K4.03M17%
Total Debt6.33MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TNGMF vs TSGZF: Fundamental Ratings
TNGMF
TSGZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2715
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
89100
SMR RATING
1..100
9991
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3565
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9896
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
44n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TNGMF's Valuation (59) in the null industry is in the same range as TSGZF (75). This means that TNGMF’s stock grew similarly to TSGZF’s over the last 12 months.

TNGMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as TSGZF (100). This means that TNGMF’s stock grew similarly to TSGZF’s over the last 12 months.

TSGZF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as TNGMF (99). This means that TSGZF’s stock grew similarly to TNGMF’s over the last 12 months.

TNGMF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as TSGZF (65). This means that TNGMF’s stock grew similarly to TSGZF’s over the last 12 months.

TSGZF's P/E Growth Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as TNGMF (98). This means that TSGZF’s stock grew similarly to TNGMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TNGMFTSGZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
22%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
23%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
TNGMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TSGZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DBEU41.14-0.57
-1.37%
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Hedged Equity ETF
BDEC42.93-0.91
-2.08%
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF™ - Dec
IDV27.03-0.59
-2.15%
iShares International Select Div ETF
FLSW32.06-0.88
-2.68%
Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF
MIDE30.59-1.20
-3.78%
Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF

TNGMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TNGMF and USHAF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TNGMF and USHAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TNGMF
1D Price
Change %
TNGMF100%
N/A
USHAF - TNGMF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.31%
USGDF - TNGMF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TSDRF - TNGMF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TORXF - TNGMF
3%
Poorly correlated
+6.01%
UGDIF - TNGMF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TSGZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TSGZF and TIHRF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TSGZF and TIHRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TSGZF
1D Price
Change %
TSGZF100%
N/A
TIHRF - TSGZF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ARMN - TSGZF
7%
Poorly correlated
-6.33%
UGDIF - TSGZF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
THMG - TSGZF
-1%
Poorly correlated
-26.48%
TNGMF - TSGZF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More