TNGMF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 18 closing price
USHAF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Ad is loading...

TNGMF vs USHAF

Header iconTNGMF vs USHAF Comparison
Open Charts TNGMF vs USHAFBanner chart's image
TGX ENERGY & RES
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$18.02K
CapitalizationN/A
USHA RES
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
TNGMF vs USHAF Comparison Chart
Loading...
VS
TNGMF vs. USHAF commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TNGMF is a Hold and USHAF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (TNGMF: $0.05 vs. USHAF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: TNGMF and USHAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: TNGMF: 193% vs. USHAF: 2%
Market capitalization -- TNGMF: $817.94K vs. USHAF: $6.07M
TNGMF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $817.94K. USHAF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $6.07M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

TNGMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUSHAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • TNGMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • USHAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TNGMF is a better buy in the long-term than USHAF.

Price Growth

TNGMF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while USHAF (@Precious Metals) price change was -8.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.61%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.12% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
USHAF($6.07M) has a higher market cap than TNGMF($818K). TNGMF YTD gains are higher at: 70.000 vs. USHAF (-24.706). TNGMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -150.13K vs. USHAF (-2.34M). USHAF has more cash in the bank: 1.02M vs. TNGMF (698K). TNGMF (0) and USHAF (0) have equivalent revenues.
TNGMFUSHAFTNGMF / USHAF
Capitalization818K6.07M13%
EBITDA-150.13K-2.34M6%
Gain YTD70.000-24.706-283%
P/E Ratio12.19N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash698K1.02M68%
Total Debt6.33MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TNGMF: Fundamental Ratings
TNGMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
38
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
98
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

TNGMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TNGMF and USHAF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TNGMF and USHAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TNGMF
1D Price
Change %
TNGMF100%
N/A
USHAF - TNGMF
20%
Poorly correlated
+3.94%
USGDF - TNGMF
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.27%
TSDRF - TNGMF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TORXF - TNGMF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.42%
UGDIF - TNGMF
1%
Poorly correlated
-11.98%
More

USHAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that USHAF and KOOYF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that USHAF and KOOYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To USHAF
1D Price
Change %
USHAF100%
+3.94%
KOOYF - USHAF
26%
Poorly correlated
-6.67%
RGLD - USHAF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.73%
MEXGF - USHAF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ADYRF - USHAF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GMDMF - USHAF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More