TRAGF
Price
$1.41
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
VDMCY
Price
$6.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 4 closing price
Ad is loading...

TRAGF vs VDMCY

Header iconTRAGF vs VDMCY Comparison
Open Charts TRAGF vs VDMCYBanner chart's image
Terago
Price$1.41
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
Vodacom Group
Price$6.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5.26K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
TRAGF vs VDMCY Comparison Chart
Loading...
VDMCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
TRAGF vs. VDMCY commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TRAGF is a Hold and VDMCY is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (TRAGF: $1.41 vs. VDMCY: $6.07)
Brand notoriety: TRAGF and VDMCY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Wireless Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: TRAGF: 100% vs. VDMCY: 137%
Market capitalization -- TRAGF: $31.41M vs. VDMCY: $12.92B
TRAGF [@Wireless Telecommunications] is valued at $31.41M. VDMCY’s [@Wireless Telecommunications] market capitalization is $12.92B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry ranges from $12.88T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry is $17.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

TRAGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVDMCY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • TRAGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VDMCY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, VDMCY is a better buy in the long-term than TRAGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

VDMCY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • VDMCY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

TRAGF (@Wireless Telecommunications) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while VDMCY (@Wireless Telecommunications) price change was +0.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was -0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.78%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Wireless Telecommunications (-0.83% weekly)

Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VDMCY($12.9B) has a higher market cap than TRAGF($31.4M). TRAGF YTD gains are higher at: 49.444 vs. VDMCY (5.800). VDMCY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 48.5B vs. TRAGF (1.07M). VDMCY has higher revenues than TRAGF: VDMCY (119B) vs TRAGF (26.2M).
TRAGFVDMCYTRAGF / VDMCY
Capitalization31.4M12.9B0%
EBITDA1.07M48.5B0%
Gain YTD49.4445.800852%
P/E RatioN/A12.53-
Revenue26.2M119B0%
Total Cash2.92MN/A-
Total Debt19.9MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TRAGF vs VDMCY: Fundamental Ratings
TRAGF
VDMCY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3762
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10094
SMR RATING
1..100
98100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5345
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10041
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a19

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TRAGF's Valuation (89) in the null industry is in the same range as VDMCY (96). This means that TRAGF’s stock grew similarly to VDMCY’s over the last 12 months.

VDMCY's Profit vs Risk Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as TRAGF (100). This means that VDMCY’s stock grew similarly to TRAGF’s over the last 12 months.

TRAGF's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as VDMCY (100). This means that TRAGF’s stock grew similarly to VDMCY’s over the last 12 months.

VDMCY's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as TRAGF (53). This means that VDMCY’s stock grew similarly to TRAGF’s over the last 12 months.

VDMCY's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TRAGF (100). This means that VDMCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than TRAGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
VDMCY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
VDMCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

TRAGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TRAGF and TRKNY have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TRAGF and TRKNY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRAGF
1D Price
Change %
TRAGF100%
N/A
TRKNY - TRAGF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TLTZF - TRAGF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TLTZY - TRAGF
1%
Poorly correlated
-8.57%
VODAF - TRAGF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VDMCY - TRAGF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-1.14%
More

VDMCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VDMCY has been loosely correlated with MTNOY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VDMCY jumps, then MTNOY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VDMCY
1D Price
Change %
VDMCY100%
-1.14%
MTNOY - VDMCY
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.37%
KT - VDMCY
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.06%
RCI - VDMCY
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.15%
SKM - VDMCY
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.65%
TELNY - VDMCY
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.32%
More