Ad is loading...
TRPCF
Price
$53.40
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 8 closing price
ZMWYF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 11 closing price
Ad is loading...

TRPCF vs ZMWYF

Header iconTRPCF vs ZMWYF Comparison
Open Charts TRPCF vs ZMWYFBanner chart's image
Trip.com Group
Price$53.40
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10.98K
CapitalizationN/A
Zoomaway Technologies
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$500
CapitalizationN/A
TRPCF vs ZMWYF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
TRPCF vs. ZMWYF commentary
Nov 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TRPCF is a Hold and ZMWYF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 23, 2024
Stock price -- (TRPCF: $53.40 vs. ZMWYF: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: TRPCF and ZMWYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Consumer Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: TRPCF: 49% vs. ZMWYF: 100%
Market capitalization -- TRPCF: $26.35B vs. ZMWYF: $2.44M
TRPCF [@Other Consumer Services] is valued at $26.35B. ZMWYF’s [@Other Consumer Services] market capitalization is $2.44M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Consumer Services] industry ranges from $121.92B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Consumer Services] industry is $9.2B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

TRPCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileZMWYF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • TRPCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ZMWYF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, TRPCF is a better buy in the long-term than ZMWYF.

Price Growth

TRPCF (@Other Consumer Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while ZMWYF (@Other Consumer Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Services industry was +2.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.29%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Consumer Services (+2.50% weekly)

Other consumer services include companies that provide consumer services, and are not classified elsewhere. Travel fare aggregators, hotel bookings, consumer-to-consumer or business-to-business sales platforms are some examples of services that can be clubbed into this category. Many of such services have expanded online. Booking Holdings Inc, The Priceline Group Inc, and eBay Inc. are some major operators in this segment.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRPCF($26.4B) has a higher market cap than ZMWYF($2.44M). TRPCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.96B vs. ZMWYF (-1.92M). TRPCF has more cash in the bank: 48B vs. ZMWYF (179K). ZMWYF has less debt than TRPCF: ZMWYF (5.26M) vs TRPCF (53.2B). TRPCF has higher revenues than ZMWYF: TRPCF (25.1B) vs ZMWYF (-1.62K).
TRPCFZMWYFTRPCF / ZMWYF
Capitalization26.4B2.44M1,080,639%
EBITDA8.96B-1.92M-466,804%
Gain YTD58.305N/A-
P/E Ratio30.58N/A-
Revenue25.1B-1.62K-1,549,382,716%
Total Cash48B179K26,815,642%
Total Debt53.2B5.26M1,011,984%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ZMWYF: Fundamental Ratings
ZMWYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
15
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
76
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
62

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IYY146.090.64
+0.44%
iShares Dow Jones US ETF
LGH53.260.22
+0.41%
HCM Defender 500 Index ETF
XRMI19.060.06
+0.31%
Global X S&P 500® Risk Managed Inc ETF
RVNU25.720.01
+0.06%
Xtrackers Municipal Infras Rev Bd ETF
IPOS12.15-0.01
-0.04%
Renaissance International IPO ETF

TRPCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TRPCF and ROL have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TRPCF and ROL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRPCF
1D Price
Change %
TRPCF100%
N/A
ROL - TRPCF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.01%
WW - TRPCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.97%
ABNB - TRPCF
7%
Poorly correlated
+3.06%
EM - TRPCF
6%
Poorly correlated
-4.65%
MRM - TRPCF
4%
Poorly correlated
-6.02%
More

ZMWYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ZMWYF and MRM have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ZMWYF and MRM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZMWYF
1D Price
Change %
ZMWYF100%
N/A
MRM - ZMWYF
1%
Poorly correlated
-6.02%
SDRMF - ZMWYF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TRPCF - ZMWYF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PLWN - ZMWYF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NTRP - ZMWYF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+10.25%
More