Ad is loading...
TSLFX vs WCMFX
TSLFX vs WCMFX Comparison
Open Charts TSLFX vs WCMFX
Transamerica Small Cap Value R4
Price$4.51
Change+$0.08 (+1.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.27M
WCM SMID Quality Val Fd Institutional
Price$11.09
Change+$0.19 (+1.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets60.55M
TSLFX vs WCMFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
TSLFX vs. WCMFX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TSLFX is a StrongBuy and WCMFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TSLFX has more cash in the bank: 74.3M vs. WCMFX (60.6M). TSLFX pays higher dividends than WCMFX: TSLFX (0.71) vs WCMFX (0.00). TSLFX was incepted earlier than WCMFX: TSLFX (22 years) vs WCMFX (6 years). WCMFX (1.27) and TSLFX (1.22) have similar cost to investors . TSLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 102.00 vs. WCMFX (15.00). TSLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMFX: TSLFX (5000) vs WCMFX (100000). WCMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -17.73 vs. TSLFX (-22.23). WCMFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.87 vs. TSLFX (-34.26).
| TSLFX | WCMFX | TSLFX / WCMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.85 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.27 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.245 | -9.349 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 100000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.3M | 60.6M | 123% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -22.23 | -17.73 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | -33.21 | 5.64 | -589% |
| Returns for 5 years | -34.26 | 38.87 | -88% |
| Returns for 10 years | -54.59 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers