UCASU
Price
$0.40
Change
-$0.30 (-42.86%)
Updated
Jan 3 closing price
Capitalization
5.49M
UILCF
Price
$1.50
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
Capitalization
1.92B
Ad is loading...

UCASU vs UILCF

Header iconUCASU vs UILCF Comparison
Open Charts UCASU vs UILCFBanner chart's image
UC Asset
Price$0.40
Change-$0.30 (-42.86%)
Volume$107
Capitalization5.49M
SINGAPORE LD GROUP
Price$1.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$200
Capitalization1.92B
UCASU vs UILCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
UCASU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UILCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
UCASU vs. UILCF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is UCASU is a Hold and UILCF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (UCASU: $0.40 vs. UILCF: $1.50)
Brand notoriety: UCASU and UILCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: UCASU: 9% vs. UILCF: 100%
Market capitalization -- UCASU: $5.49M vs. UILCF: $1.92B
UCASU [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $5.49M. UILCF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $1.92B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.43B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

UCASU’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUILCF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • UCASU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • UILCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, UCASU is a better buy in the long-term than UILCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

UCASU’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UILCF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • UCASU’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • UILCF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UILCF is a better buy in the short-term than UCASU.

Price Growth

UCASU (@Real Estate Development) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while UILCF (@Real Estate Development) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +1.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.82%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+1.59% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UILCF($1.92B) has a higher market cap than UCASU($5.49M). UILCF has higher P/E ratio than UCASU: UILCF (10.95) vs UCASU (5.80). UILCF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. UCASU (-42.857). UCASU has less debt than UILCF: UCASU (400K) vs UILCF (564M). UILCF has higher revenues than UCASU: UILCF (673M) vs UCASU (7.01M).
UCASUUILCFUCASU / UILCF
Capitalization5.49M1.92B0%
EBITDAN/A389M-
Gain YTD-42.8570.000-
P/E Ratio5.8010.9553%
Revenue7.01M673M1%
Total CashN/A225M-
Total Debt400K564M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
UILCF: Fundamental Ratings
UILCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
83
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
70
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
22
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
UCASUUILCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
76%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
58%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
69%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
11%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
11%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
29%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
UCASU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UILCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PGWAX87.551.08
+1.25%
Virtus Silvant Focused Growth A
AOTCX29.100.25
+0.87%
Virtus Emerging Markets Opps C
MKVEX13.250.08
+0.61%
MFS International Large Cap Value R2
UIPMX20.840.12
+0.58%
Victory Precious Metals & Minerals Instl
BALSX9.650.05
+0.52%
BlackRock U.S. Insights Lon/Shr Eq Inv A

UCASU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UCASU and WARFF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UCASU and WARFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UCASU
1D Price
Change %
UCASU100%
N/A
WARFF - UCASU
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRRE - UCASU
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SURDF - UCASU
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UILCF - UCASU
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VESTF - UCASU
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

UILCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UILCF and AZLCZ have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UILCF and AZLCZ's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UILCF
1D Price
Change %
UILCF100%
N/A
AZLCZ - UILCF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.77%
UOLGY - UILCF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.67%
SUHJF - UILCF
3%
Poorly correlated
+3.86%
SWPFF - UILCF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SUHJY - UILCF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.22%
More