Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
UVABX vs VNDFX
UVABX vs VNDFX Comparison
Open Charts UVABX vs VNDFX
Victory VA Bond
Price$10.07
Change-$0.03 (-0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets470.63M
Viking Tax-Free for North Dakota A
Price$8.53
Change-$0.03 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.25M
UVABX vs VNDFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
UVABX vs. VNDFX commentary
May 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is UVABX is a Hold and VNDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UVABX has more cash in the bank: 471M vs. VNDFX (17.2M). VNDFX pays higher dividends than UVABX: VNDFX (3.16) vs UVABX (2.85). UVABX was incepted earlier than VNDFX: UVABX (15 years) vs VNDFX (26 years). VNDFX (1.30) is less costly to investors than UVABX (0.87). VNDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.91 vs. UVABX (6.00). VNDFX initial investment is less costly to investors than UVABX (2%) vs UVABX (2%). VNDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than UVABX: VNDFX (1000) vs UVABX (2500). UVABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.26 vs. VNDFX (-2.28). UVABX return over 5 years is better than : 1.20 vs. VNDFX (-7.81).
| UVABX | VNDFX | UVABX / VNDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.98 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.30 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.431 | -2.382 | 102% |
| Front Load | 2% | 3% | 90% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 471M | 17.2M | 2,738% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.85 | 3.16 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.26 | -2.28 | 11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.77 | -0.31 | -1,889% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.20 | -7.81 | -15% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.48 | 3.28 | 136% |