VIS
Price
$324.24
Change
+$0.13 (+0.04%)
Updated
Oct 12, 11:09 AM (EDT)
Net Assets
8.07B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XLI
Price
$169.65
Change
+$0.40 (+0.24%)
Updated
Oct 12, 11:11 AM (EDT)
Net Assets
30.61B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

VIS vs XLI

VIS vs XLI Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Oct 02, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) vs. Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI)

Key Takeaways

  • Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) tracks the MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index, providing broader exposure across large-, mid-, and small-capitalization companies in the industrials sector, while Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI) tracks the Industrial Select Sector Index focused exclusively on S&P 500 constituents.
  • VIS holds approximately 396 securities with a more diversified profile, whereas XLI maintains a concentrated portfolio of roughly 81 to 86 holdings, resulting in higher individual position weights.
  • Both ETFs employ passive strategies with full replication where feasible; VIS carries an expense ratio of 0.09 percent, while XLI offers a slightly lower 0.08 percent expense ratio.
  • Top holdings overlap significantly in names such as Caterpillar Inc. (CAT), GE Aerospace (GE), and RTX Corp. (RTX), yet XLI assigns larger weights to these leaders due to its market-capitalization methodology limited to large-cap names.
  • VIS incorporates greater small- and mid-cap representation, potentially increasing diversification but also introducing modestly higher volatility relative to XLI’s large-cap focus.
  • Both funds deliver targeted industrials sector exposure suited for investors seeking tactical or strategic allocations within the broader equity market without active management overlays.

Introduction

Investors evaluating sector-specific vehicles often compare Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) and Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI) because both deliver passive exposure to U.S. industrials companies. These exchange-traded funds (ETFs) compete directly within the same sector yet differ structurally: VIS captures a wider capitalization spectrum through its benchmark, while XLI concentrates on S&P 500 industrials names. The comparison helps investors assess trade-offs between breadth of holdings, cost efficiency, and concentration risk when constructing portfolios that target manufacturing, transportation, aerospace, and related industries amid ongoing economic and infrastructure cycles.

Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) Overview

Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) seeks to track the performance of the MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index. The fund employs a passively managed, full-replication strategy when possible and holds approximately 396 securities spanning large-, mid-, and small-capitalization companies classified under the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) industrials sector. Top holdings typically include Caterpillar Inc. (CAT), GE Aerospace (GE), GE Vernova Inc. (GEV), RTX Corp. (RTX), and Deere & Co. (DE), with the largest positions generally below 7 percent. Sector allocation remains overwhelmingly concentrated in industrials, supplemented by modest technology exposure from certain holdings. The expense ratio stands at 0.09 percent, supporting low-cost, long-term ownership. VIS distinguishes itself through broader market-capitalization coverage compared with S&P 500-restricted peers.

Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI) Overview

Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI) seeks investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield performance of the Industrial Select Sector Index. This passive, market-capitalization-weighted ETF holds roughly 81 to 86 securities drawn exclusively from the S&P 500 industrials constituents. Top holdings mirror those of VIS but carry higher weights, frequently exceeding 6 percent for leaders such as Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) and GE Aerospace (GE). The fund maintains an expense ratio of 0.08 percent. XLI’s structure limits exposure to large-capitalization names only, producing a more concentrated portfolio with lower turnover. Rebalancing follows quarterly index methodology adjustments to maintain sector representation within the S&P 500 framework.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The U.S. industrials sector encompasses aerospace and defense, machinery, transportation, electrical equipment, and commercial services. Macroeconomic drivers include infrastructure spending legislation, defense budgets, manufacturing reshoring trends, and global supply-chain adjustments. Capital flows into the sector often respond to interest-rate expectations and capital-expenditure cycles of corporate clients. Regulatory developments around trade policy and environmental standards can influence input costs and project pipelines. Sector risks encompass cyclical sensitivity to economic slowdowns, commodity-price volatility, and geopolitical tensions affecting export markets and defense contracts. Both ETFs provide pure-play access without leverage or thematic overlays beyond traditional GICS classification.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, VIS and XLI have exhibited correlated movements driven by shared exposure to large-cap industrials leaders, yet VIS’s inclusion of smaller-capitalization names has produced modestly different volatility profiles during periods of small-cap outperformance or underperformance. Relative positioning favors XLI for investors prioritizing lower expense ratios and tighter tracking to S&P 500 industrials benchmarks, while VIS offers incremental diversification across the capitalization spectrum. Earnings cycles of top holdings such as Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) and RTX Corp. (RTX) influence both funds, with defense and infrastructure spending providing common tailwinds. Interest-rate sensitivity remains comparable, though XLI’s concentration can amplify reactions to individual company results. Sector rotation favoring cyclicals has historically supported both vehicles during expansionary phases.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors comparing sector ETFs may find the tool useful for refining screening criteria around industrials exposure and relative strength metrics.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors including marginally lower expense ratio, precise large-cap focus, and established liquidity profile, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a probabilistic edge to Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI) for investors seeking efficient, concentrated industrials exposure within the S&P 500 universe. VIS remains competitive for those prioritizing broader diversification across capitalization tiers. Selection ultimately depends on individual portfolio objectives regarding concentration versus breadth.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations
VS
VIS vs. XLI commentary
Oct 12, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is VIS is a Buy and XLI is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
VISXLI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
VIS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XLI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LPRE27.280.34
+1.28%
Long Pond Real Estate Select ETF
PMDE26.30N/A
N/A
PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - December (PMDE)
EAGG45.28-0.02
-0.04%
iShares ESG Aware US Aggregate Bond ETF (EAGG)
KSA36.06-0.03
-0.08%
iShares MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF (KSA)
PUI42.35-0.04
-0.09%
Invesco Dorsey Wright Utilities Momentum ETF (PUI)

VIS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VIS has been closely correlated with EMR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VIS jumps, then EMR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VIS
1D Price
Change %
VIS100%
+0.46%
EMR - VIS
80%
Closely correlated
+1.74%
CAT - VIS
79%
Closely correlated
+0.54%
AME - VIS
78%
Closely correlated
+0.43%
TKR - VIS
77%
Closely correlated
+1.56%
WAB - VIS
76%
Closely correlated
+1.65%
More

XLI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLI has been closely correlated with EMR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLI jumps, then EMR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XLI
1D Price
Change %
XLI100%
+0.50%
EMR - XLI
79%
Closely correlated
+1.74%
AME - XLI
78%
Closely correlated
+0.43%
CAT - XLI
77%
Closely correlated
+0.54%
WAB - XLI
76%
Closely correlated
+1.65%
TT - XLI
75%
Closely correlated
+1.50%
More