WRDLY vs WWLNF
To understand the difference between Worldline - ADR (WRDLY) vs. Worldline (WWLNF) it is enough to know the definitions of ADR
ADR - American depositary receipt (ADR) is a certificate issued by a U.S. depositary bank representing a specified number of shares (often 1 share) of a foreign company's stock. ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars and trade on U.S. stock markets and OTC depending on the ADRs classification.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
WRDLY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWWLNF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- WRDLY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- WWLNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
WRDLY’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- WRDLY’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 1 bearish.
Price Growth
WRDLY (@Packaged Software) experienced а -4.43% price change this week, while WWLNF (@Packaged Software) price change was +1.23% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.92%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+1.14% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| WRDLY | WWLNF | WRDLY / WWLNF | |
| Capitalization | 3.31B | 11.2B | 30% |
| EBITDA | 768M | 907M | 85% |
| Gain YTD | -61.307 | -59.467 | 103% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.87 | 42.02 | 31% |
| Revenue | 4.02B | 4.59B | 88% |
| Total Cash | 1.17B | 1.42B | 82% |
| Total Debt | 5.05B | 3.58B | 141% |
WRDLY | WWLNF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 2 | 89 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 41 Fair valued | 56 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 93 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | 82 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 30 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
WRDLY's Valuation (41) in the null industry is in the same range as WWLNF (56). This means that WRDLY’s stock grew similarly to WWLNF’s over the last 12 months.
WRDLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as WWLNF (100). This means that WRDLY’s stock grew similarly to WWLNF’s over the last 12 months.
WRDLY's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as WWLNF (94). This means that WRDLY’s stock grew similarly to WWLNF’s over the last 12 months.
WRDLY's Price Growth Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as WWLNF (93). This means that WRDLY’s stock grew similarly to WWLNF’s over the last 12 months.
WWLNF's P/E Growth Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as WRDLY (99). This means that WWLNF’s stock grew similarly to WRDLY’s over the last 12 months.
| WRDLY | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 56% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 37% |
WRDLY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WRDLY has been closely correlated with WWLNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WRDLY jumps, then WWLNF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WRDLY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WRDLY | 100% | -2.76% | ||
| WWLNF - WRDLY | 77% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| FALC - WRDLY | 40% Loosely correlated | +6.47% | ||
| NEXXY - WRDLY | 37% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| ADYEY - WRDLY | 32% Poorly correlated | +1.21% | ||
| AFRM - WRDLY | 32% Poorly correlated | -8.42% | ||
More | ||||
WWLNF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WWLNF has been closely correlated with WRDLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WWLNF jumps, then WRDLY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WWLNF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WWLNF | 100% | N/A | ||
| WRDLY - WWLNF | 77% Closely correlated | -2.76% | ||
| NEXXY - WWLNF | 40% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| FALC - WWLNF | 36% Loosely correlated | +6.47% | ||
| ENV - WWLNF | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.05% | ||
| ITMSF - WWLNF | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.92% | ||
More | ||||