It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
YOTA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileYOTAU’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
YOTA’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YOTAU’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
YOTA (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +0.27% price change this week, while YOTAU (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +1.34% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.18%.
YOTA is expected to report earnings on Mar 10, 2023.
Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
YOTA | YOTAU | YOTA / YOTAU | |
Capitalization | 42.6M | N/A | - |
EBITDA | -2.38M | -2.38M | 100% |
Gain YTD | 8.889 | 5.000 | 178% |
P/E Ratio | 102.90 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 0 | 0 | - |
Total Cash | 460K | 460K | 100% |
Total Debt | 1.27M | 1.27M | 100% |
YOTA | YOTAU | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago36% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago6% | 1 day ago25% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago9% | 1 day ago38% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago4% | 1 day ago45% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago13% | 1 day ago30% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago14% | 1 day ago26% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago11% | 1 day ago13% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, YOTA has been loosely correlated with GLLIU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if YOTA jumps, then GLLIU could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To YOTA | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
YOTA | 100% | N/A | ||
GLLIU - YOTA | 46% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
PORT - YOTA | 36% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
GDST - YOTA | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
TGAAU - YOTA | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
PPYAU - YOTA | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |