Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AOR or BAMA or KEAT
AOR vs BAMA vs KEAT Comparison
Open Charts AOR vs BAMA vs KEAT
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allc ETF
Price$60.30
Change+$0.32 (+0.53%)
Volume$500
Net Assets2.43B
Brookstone Active ETF
Price$31.22
Change+$0.22 (+0.71%)
Volume$229
Net Assets41.9M
Keating Active ETF
Price$27.57
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.09K
Net Assets88.47M
AOR vs BAMA vs KEAT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AOR has more net assets: 2.43B vs. KEAT (88.5M) and BAMA (41.9M). KEAT has a higher annual dividend yield than AOR and BAMA: KEAT (9.132) vs AOR (5.652) and BAMA (2.433). AOR was incepted earlier than BAMA and KEAT: AOR (17 years) vs BAMA (2 years) and KEAT (1 year). AOR (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than KEAT (0.86) and BAMA (0.99). AOR has a higher turnover KEAT (4.00) and BAMA (0.00) vs KEAT (4.00) and BAMA (0.00).
| AOR | BAMA | KEAT | |
| Gain YTD | 5.652 | 2.433 | 9.132 |
| Net Assets | 2.43B | 41.9M | 88.5M |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.99 | 0.86 |
| Turnover | 5.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 |
| Yield | 2.60 | 1.42 | 1.85 |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 2 years | 1 year |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| AOR | BAMA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 50% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% | 4 days ago 58% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 73% | 14 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
KEAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KEAT has been loosely correlated with SHEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KEAT jumps, then SHEL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KEAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KEAT | 100% | -0.00% | ||
| SHEL - KEAT | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.56% | ||
| SU - KEAT | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.25% | ||
| HES - KEAT | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.56% | ||
| OII - KEAT | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.02% | ||
| XOM - KEAT | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.33% | ||
More | ||||