BIIB
Price
$131.95
Change
+$3.95 (+3.09%)
Updated
Aug 1 closing price
Capitalization
31.34B
79 days until earnings call
EDAP
Price
$1.30
Change
-$0.10 (-7.14%)
Updated
Aug 1 closing price
Capitalization
281.62M
17 days until earnings call
NNVC
Price
$1.58
Change
-$0.04 (-2.47%)
Updated
Aug 1 closing price
Capitalization
25.39M
31 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BIIB or EDAP or NNVC

Header iconBIIB vs EDAP vs NNVC Comparison
Open Charts BIIB vs EDAP vs NNVCBanner chart's image
Biogen
Price$131.95
Change+$3.95 (+3.09%)
Volume$2.8M
Capitalization31.34B
EDAP TMS SA
Price$1.30
Change-$0.10 (-7.14%)
Volume$96.96K
Capitalization281.62M
NanoViricides
Price$1.58
Change-$0.04 (-2.47%)
Volume$179.5K
Capitalization25.39M
BIIB vs EDAP vs NNVC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BIIB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EDAP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NNVC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 04, 2025
Stock price -- (BIIB: $131.95EDAP: $1.30NNVC: $1.62)
Brand notoriety: EDAP and NNVC are not notable and BIIB is notable
BIIB represents the Pharmaceuticals: Major industry, EDAP is part of the Medical Distributors industry, and NNVC is in the Biotechnology industry.
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BIIB: 195%, EDAP: 222%, NNVC: 1%
Market capitalization -- BIIB: $31.34B, EDAP: $281.62M, NNVC: $25.39M
BIIB [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] is valued at $31.34B. EDAP’s [@Medical Distributors] market capitalization is $281.62M. NNVC [@Biotechnology] has a market capitalization of $25.39M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] industry ranges from $739.66B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical Distributors] industry ranges from $70.55B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Biotechnology] industry ranges from $213.98B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] industry is $86.34B. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Distributors] industry is $10.22B. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Distributors] industry is $2.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BIIB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileEDAP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and NNVC’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BIIB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • EDAP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NNVC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NNVC is a better buy in the long-term than BIIB, which in turn is a better option than EDAP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BIIB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EDAP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and NNVC’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BIIB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • EDAP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NNVC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BIIB is a better buy in the short-term than EDAP, which in turn is a better option than NNVC.

Price Growth

BIIB (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) experienced а +0.33% price change this week, while EDAP (@Medical Distributors) price change was -6.90% , and NNVC (@Biotechnology) price fluctuated -3.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Major industry was +1.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.91%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Distributors industry was -4.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.65%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was +0.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +36.18%.

Reported Earning Dates

BIIB is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

EDAP is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2025.

NNVC is expected to report earnings on Sep 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Major (+1.03% weekly)

The Major Pharmaceuticals industry includes companies that are involved in various processes of creating drugs to treat/prevent diseases. These companies engage in research, testing and manufacturing, as well as the distribution of pharmaceuticals into markets. Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Novartis are among the largest companies in this category.

@Medical Distributors (-4.30% weekly)

Healthcare distribution market can be segmented into pharmaceutical product distribution services, medical device distribution services, and biopharmaceutical product distribution services. In addition to serving as intermediaries, many medical distributors also purchase and take legal ownership of pharmaceuticals and manage inventory and credit risk. According to a Deloitte report, pharmaceutical distributors’ core services of efficient product distribution, inventory management, financial risk management, and information-sharing generate $33 billion-$53 billion in value annually to the U.S. health care ecosystem. Some prominent players in the overall medical distribution industry include McKesson Corporation, AmerisourceBergen Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc. and Patterson Companies, Inc.

@Biotechnology (+0.14% weekly)

Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BIIB($31.3B) has a higher market cap than EDAP($282M) and NNVC($25.4M). EDAP has higher P/E ratio than BIIB and NNVC: EDAP (100.00) vs BIIB (26.95) and NNVC (). NNVC YTD gains are higher at: 10.490 vs. BIIB (-13.713) and EDAP (-41.023). BIIB has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.04B vs. NNVC (-8.95M) and EDAP (-18.39M). BIIB has more cash in the bank: 1.05B vs. EDAP (43.5M) and NNVC (2.54M). NNVC has less debt than EDAP and BIIB: NNVC (1.5M) vs EDAP (8.42M) and BIIB (7.34B). BIIB has higher revenues than EDAP and NNVC: BIIB (9.84B) vs EDAP (60.4M) and NNVC (0).
BIIBEDAPNNVC
Capitalization31.3B282M25.4M
EBITDA2.04B-18.39M-8.95M
Gain YTD-13.713-41.02310.490
P/E Ratio26.95100.00N/A
Revenue9.84B60.4M0
Total Cash1.05B43.5M2.54M
Total Debt7.34B8.42M1.5M
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BIIB vs EDAP vs NNVC: Fundamental Ratings
BIIB
EDAP
NNVC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
505345
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
98
Overvalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100100
SMR RATING
1..100
729697
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
619443
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
94100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NNVC's Valuation (35) in the Biotechnology industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BIIB (85) and is somewhat better than the same rating for EDAP (98). This means that NNVC's stock grew somewhat faster than BIIB’s and somewhat faster than EDAP’s over the last 12 months.

NNVC's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as BIIB (100) and is in the same range as EDAP (100). This means that NNVC's stock grew similarly to BIIB’s and similarly to EDAP’s over the last 12 months.

BIIB's SMR Rating (72) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as EDAP (96) and is in the same range as NNVC (97). This means that BIIB's stock grew similarly to EDAP’s and similarly to NNVC’s over the last 12 months.

NNVC's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as BIIB (61) and is somewhat better than the same rating for EDAP (94). This means that NNVC's stock grew similarly to BIIB’s and somewhat faster than EDAP’s over the last 12 months.

BIIB's P/E Growth Rating (94) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as NNVC (100) and is in the same range as EDAP (100). This means that BIIB's stock grew similarly to NNVC’s and similarly to EDAP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BIIBEDAPNNVC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BIIB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EDAP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NNVC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IBND31.850.39
+1.25%
SPDR® Blmbg Intl Corp Bd ETF
BSMV20.680.12
+0.61%
Invesco BulletShares 2031 Muncpl Bd ETF
HBMBF204.00N/A
N/A
HBM Bioventures AG
MEMS25.67N/A
N/A
Matthews Emerging Markets Discv Actv ETF
MLPX62.05-0.13
-0.21%
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF

EDAP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EDAP and AORT have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EDAP and AORT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EDAP
1D Price
Change %
EDAP100%
-6.90%
AORT - EDAP
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.03%
AVNS - EDAP
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.70%
SRDX - EDAP
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
UFPT - EDAP
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
SENS - EDAP
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.78%
More

NNVC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NNVC and MRUS have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NNVC and MRUS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NNVC
1D Price
Change %
NNVC100%
-2.47%
MRUS - NNVC
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.03%
GOSS - NNVC
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.96%
KYTX - NNVC
30%
Poorly correlated
-3.64%
TYRA - NNVC
30%
Poorly correlated
-5.12%
IFRX - NNVC
30%
Poorly correlated
-4.97%
More