Advertisement
CGEN vs ILMN
Notable companies
Industry description
Market Cap
High and low price notable news
Volume
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Notable companies
Market Cap
High and low price notable news
Volume
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGEN is a Hold and ILMN is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CGEN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileILMN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CGEN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- ILMN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CGEN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ILMN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CGEN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- ILMN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CGEN (@Biotechnology) experienced а -3.27% price change this week, while ILMN (@Medical Specialties) price change was -13.39% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was +1.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +16.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +37.20%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was -2.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.69%.
Reported Earning Dates
CGEN is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.
ILMN is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Biotechnology (+1.32% weekly)Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.
@Medical Specialties (-2.60% weekly)Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.
| CGEN | ILMN | CGEN / ILMN | |
| Capitalization | 139M | 21.1B | 1% |
| EBITDA | -14.79M | -608M | 2% |
| Gain YTD | -3.268 | -29.163 | 11% |
| P/E Ratio | 64.00 | 49.50 | 129% |
| Revenue | 27.6M | 4.5B | 1% |
| Total Cash | 104M | 1.05B | 10% |
| Total Debt | 2.77M | 2.26B | 0% |
CGEN | ILMN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 57 | 67 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 76 Overvalued | 78 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 87 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 22 | 92 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CGEN's Valuation (76) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as ILMN (78). This means that CGEN’s stock grew similarly to ILMN’s over the last 12 months.
CGEN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as ILMN (100). This means that CGEN’s stock grew similarly to ILMN’s over the last 12 months.
CGEN's SMR Rating (94) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as ILMN (94). This means that CGEN’s stock grew similarly to ILMN’s over the last 12 months.
ILMN's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Biotechnology industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CGEN (87). This means that ILMN’s stock grew somewhat faster than CGEN’s over the last 12 months.
CGEN's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Biotechnology industry is significantly better than the same rating for ILMN (92). This means that CGEN’s stock grew significantly faster than ILMN’s over the last 12 months.
| CGEN | ILMN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 81% | 5 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 75% |
Advertisement
CGEN and Stocks
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGEN has been loosely correlated with BDTX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CGEN jumps, then BDTX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGEN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGEN | 100% | +2.07% | ||
| BDTX - CGEN | 47% Loosely correlated | -2.63% | ||
| NURPF - CGEN | 46% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| ROIV - CGEN | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.79% | ||
| RLAY - CGEN | 41% Loosely correlated | -4.55% | ||
| ASPHF - CGEN | 41% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
ILMN and Stocks
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ILMN has been loosely correlated with A. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ILMN jumps, then A could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ILMN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILMN | 100% | -7.84% | ||
| A - ILMN | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.14% | ||
| BIO - ILMN | 64% Loosely correlated | +17.63% | ||
| BRKR - ILMN | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.14% | ||
| RVTY - ILMN | 63% Loosely correlated | -2.88% | ||
| IQV - ILMN | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.83% | ||
More | ||||