Ad is loading...
CHIQ or FCA or MCH
CHIQ vs FCA vs MCH Comparison
Open Charts CHIQ vs FCA vs MCH
Global X MSCI China Consumer Disc ETF
Price$21.60
Change+$0.05 (+0.23%)
Volume$12.38K
Net Assets232.24M
First Trust China AlphaDEX® ETF
Price$21.30
Change+$0.03 (+0.14%)
Volume$1.8K
Net Assets35.06M
Matthews China Active ETF
Price$23.51
Change+$0.32 (+1.38%)
Volume$453
Net Assets19.5M
CHIQ vs FCA vs MCH Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CHIQ has more net assets: 232M vs. FCA (35.1M) and MCH (19.5M). CHIQ has a higher annual dividend yield than MCH and FCA: CHIQ (13.804) vs MCH (6.633) and FCA (6.372). CHIQ was incepted earlier than FCA and MCH: CHIQ (15 years) vs FCA (14 years) and MCH (3 years). CHIQ (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than MCH (0.79) and FCA (0.80). FCA has a higher turnover MCH (55.22) and CHIQ (32.76) vs MCH (55.22) and CHIQ (32.76).
| CHIQ | FCA | MCH | |
| Gain YTD | 13.804 | 6.372 | 6.633 |
| Net Assets | 232M | 35.1M | 19.5M |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.80 | 0.79 |
| Turnover | 32.76 | 62.00 | 55.22 |
| Yield | 2.41 | 4.59 | 1.28 |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 14 years | 3 years |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CHIQ | MCH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 87% | 5 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 87% | 7 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CHIQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHIQ has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CHIQ jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHIQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHIQ | 100% | +0.24% | ||
| BABA - CHIQ | 85% Closely correlated | +0.86% | ||
| JD - CHIQ | 82% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| YUMC - CHIQ | 70% Closely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| BZUN - CHIQ | 69% Closely correlated | +7.72% | ||
| VIPS - CHIQ | 69% Closely correlated | +1.89% | ||
More | ||||
MCH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCH has been loosely correlated with QFIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCH jumps, then QFIN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCH | 100% | +1.39% | ||
| QFIN - MCH | 62% Loosely correlated | +2.81% | ||
| LKNCY - MCH | 47% Loosely correlated | -1.58% | ||
| DIDIY - MCH | 46% Loosely correlated | +2.84% | ||
| BILI - MCH | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HTHT - MCH | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.55% | ||
More | ||||