CMS
Price
$70.69
Change
+$0.36 (+0.51%)
Updated
Jul 16 closing price
Capitalization
17.91B
14 days until earnings call
CRS
Price
$279.18
Change
+$0.63 (+0.23%)
Updated
Jul 16, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
13.9B
15 days until earnings call
NGS
Price
$23.96
Change
-$0.33 (-1.36%)
Updated
Jul 16 closing price
Capitalization
241.66M
32 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMS or CRS or NGS

Header iconCMS vs CRS vs NGS Comparison
Open Charts CMS vs CRS vs NGSBanner chart's image
CMS Energy
Price$70.69
Change+$0.36 (+0.51%)
Volume$1.59M
Capitalization17.91B
Carpenter Technology
Price$279.18
Change+$0.63 (+0.23%)
Volume$2.1K
Capitalization13.9B
Natural Gas Services Group
Price$23.96
Change-$0.33 (-1.36%)
Volume$64.45K
Capitalization241.66M
CMS vs CRS vs NGS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CRS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 17, 2025
Stock price -- (CMS: $70.69CRS: $279.30NGS: $23.96)
Brand notoriety: CMS, CRS and NGS are all not notable
CMS represents the Electric Utilities industry, CRS is part of the Metal Fabrication industry, and NGS is in the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry.
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMS: 67%, CRS: 52%, NGS: 86%
Market capitalization -- CMS: $17.91B, CRS: $13.9B, NGS: $241.66M
CMS [@Electric Utilities] is valued at $17.91B. CRS’s [@Metal Fabrication] market capitalization is $13.9B. NGS [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] has a market capitalization of $241.66M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electric Utilities] industry ranges from $131.17B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Metal Fabrication] industry ranges from $56.71B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $79.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electric Utilities] industry is $18.65B. The average market capitalization across the [@Metal Fabrication] industry is $2.51B. The average market capitalization across the [@Metal Fabrication] industry is $3.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCRS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and NGS’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CMS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CRS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NGS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CRS is a better buy in the long-term than CMS, which in turn is a better option than NGS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CRS’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s), and NGS’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • CRS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NGS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CMS is a better buy in the short-term than NGS, which in turn is a better option than CRS.

Price Growth

CMS (@Electric Utilities) experienced а +1.33% price change this week, while CRS (@Metal Fabrication) price change was +0.92% , and NGS (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price fluctuated -2.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was -0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.04%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Metal Fabrication industry was +2.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +33.52%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was -1.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.57%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMS is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

CRS is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

NGS is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electric Utilities (-0.08% weekly)

Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.

@Metal Fabrication (+2.68% weekly)

The industry is involved in value-added processes including creation of metal structures like machines and parts by cutting, bending and assembling, using various raw materials. A fabrication shop often bids on a project/job, and then builds the product if awarded the contract. Robotics and automation are making their way into the industry apparently to fill in skills gap[s19] . RBC Bearings Incorporated, Timken Company and Valmont Industries, Inc. are some of the largest metal fabrication companies in the U.S.

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (-1.79% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMS($17.9B) has a higher market cap than CRS($13.9B) and NGS($242M). NGS has higher P/E ratio than CRS and CMS: NGS (112.50) vs CRS (39.45) and CMS (19.93). CRS YTD gains are higher at: 64.494 vs. CMS (7.697) and NGS (-10.597). CMS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.78B vs. CRS (624M) and NGS (31.4M). CMS has more cash in the bank: 227M vs. CRS (152M) and NGS (197K). NGS has less debt than CRS and CMS: NGS (128M) vs CRS (703M) and CMS (15.6B). CMS has higher revenues than CRS and NGS: CMS (7.46B) vs CRS (2.92B) and NGS (107M).
CMSCRSNGS
Capitalization17.9B13.9B242M
EBITDA2.78B624M31.4M
Gain YTD7.69764.494-10.597
P/E Ratio19.9339.45112.50
Revenue7.46B2.92B107M
Total Cash227M152M197K
Total Debt15.6B703M128M
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMS vs CRS vs NGS: Fundamental Ratings
CMS
CRS
NGS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
603169
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
50
Fair valued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
39428
SMR RATING
1..100
6010079
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
543653
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3410089
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
855050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CRS's Valuation (50) in the Metal Fabrication industry is in the same range as NGS (65) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry, and is in the same range as CMS (66) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that CRS's stock grew similarly to NGS’s and similarly to CMS’s over the last 12 months.

CRS's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Metal Fabrication industry is in the same range as NGS (28) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for CMS (39) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that CRS's stock grew similarly to NGS’s and somewhat faster than CMS’s over the last 12 months.

CMS's SMR Rating (60) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as NGS (79) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for CRS (100) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that CMS's stock grew similarly to NGS’s and somewhat faster than CRS’s over the last 12 months.

CRS's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Metal Fabrication industry is in the same range as NGS (53) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry, and is in the same range as CMS (54) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that CRS's stock grew similarly to NGS’s and similarly to CMS’s over the last 12 months.

CMS's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the Electric Utilities industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NGS (89) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for CRS (100) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that CMS's stock grew somewhat faster than NGS’s and significantly faster than CRS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMSCRSNGS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
44%
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CRS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PTA19.970.04
+0.22%
Cohen & Steers Tax-Advantaged Preferred Securities and Income Fund
BILZ101.020.01
+0.01%
PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active ETF
GRWXF4.25N/A
N/A
MOLTEN VENTURES PLC
BBBL47.43N/A
N/A
BondBloxx BBB Rated 10+ Yr Corp Bd ETF
IGTR24.28-0.20
-0.82%
Innovator Gradient Tactical Rot Str ETF