Ad is loading...
CSM or FQAL or MOAT
CSM vs FQAL vs MOAT Comparison
Open Charts CSM vs FQAL vs MOAT
ProShares Large Cap Core Plus
Price$62.77
Change+$0.24 (+0.38%)
Volume$300
Net Assets420.1M
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF
Price$62.76
Change+$0.09 (+0.14%)
Volume$100
Net Assets972.9M
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
Price$85.14
Change+$0.12 (+0.14%)
Volume$1.2K
Net Assets12.21B
CSM vs FQAL vs MOAT Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MOAT has more net assets: 12.2B vs. FQAL (973M) and CSM (420M). FQAL has a higher annual dividend yield than CSM and MOAT: FQAL (-3.922) vs CSM (-5.210) and MOAT (-8.310). CSM was incepted earlier than FQAL and MOAT: CSM (16 years) vs FQAL (9 years) and MOAT (13 years). FQAL (0.16) has a lower expense ratio than CSM (0.45) and MOAT (0.47). CSM has a higher turnover MOAT (51.00) and FQAL (34.00) vs MOAT (51.00) and FQAL (34.00).
| CSM | FQAL | MOAT | |
| Gain YTD | -5.210 | -3.922 | -8.310 |
| Net Assets | 420M | 973M | 12.2B |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.16 | 0.47 |
| Turnover | 57.00 | 34.00 | 51.00 |
| Yield | 1.14 | 1.28 | 1.44 |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 9 years | 13 years |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CSM | FQAL | MOAT | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 76% | 5 days ago 76% | 10 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FQAL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FQAL has been closely correlated with PH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FQAL jumps, then PH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FQAL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FQAL | 100% | +1.74% | ||
| PH - FQAL | 79% Closely correlated | +2.75% | ||
| SEIC - FQAL | 70% Closely correlated | +7.81% | ||
| ISRG - FQAL | 69% Closely correlated | +4.14% | ||
| BKNG - FQAL | 67% Closely correlated | +2.05% | ||
| SPGI - FQAL | 65% Loosely correlated | +2.35% | ||
More | ||||
MOAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MOAT has been closely correlated with BLK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MOAT jumps, then BLK could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MOAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MOAT | 100% | +2.59% | ||
| BLK - MOAT | 78% Closely correlated | +2.66% | ||
| MCHP - MOAT | 75% Closely correlated | +12.38% | ||
| TROW - MOAT | 74% Closely correlated | +3.30% | ||
| NXPI - MOAT | 72% Closely correlated | +7.02% | ||
| USB - MOAT | 71% Closely correlated | +1.37% | ||
More | ||||