Ad is loading...
CSM or FQAL or MOTE
CSM vs FQAL vs MOTE Comparison
Open Charts CSM vs FQAL vs MOTE
ProShares Large Cap Core Plus
Price$62.77
Change+$0.24 (+0.38%)
Volume$300
Net Assets420.1M
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF
Price$62.76
Change+$0.09 (+0.14%)
Volume$100
Net Assets972.9M
VanEck Morningstar ESG Moat ETF
Price$25.16
Change+$0.51 (+2.07%)
Volume$285.22K
Net Assets5.66M
CSM vs FQAL vs MOTE Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FQAL has more net assets: 973M vs. CSM (420M) and MOTE (5.66M). FQAL has a higher annual dividend yield than CSM and MOTE: FQAL (-3.922) vs CSM (-5.210) and MOTE (-10.782). CSM was incepted earlier than FQAL and MOTE: CSM (16 years) vs FQAL (9 years) and MOTE (4 years). FQAL (0.16) has a lower expense ratio than CSM (0.45) and MOTE (0.50). CSM has a higher turnover MOTE (38.00) and FQAL (34.00) vs MOTE (38.00) and FQAL (34.00).
| CSM | FQAL | MOTE | |
| Gain YTD | -5.210 | -3.922 | -10.782 |
| Net Assets | 420M | 973M | 5.66M |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.16 | 0.50 |
| Turnover | 57.00 | 34.00 | 38.00 |
| Yield | 1.14 | 1.28 | 1.00 |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 9 years | 4 years |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CSM | FQAL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 76% | 5 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FQAL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FQAL has been closely correlated with PH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FQAL jumps, then PH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FQAL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FQAL | 100% | +1.74% | ||
| PH - FQAL | 79% Closely correlated | +2.75% | ||
| SEIC - FQAL | 70% Closely correlated | +7.81% | ||
| ISRG - FQAL | 69% Closely correlated | +4.14% | ||
| BKNG - FQAL | 67% Closely correlated | +2.05% | ||
| SPGI - FQAL | 65% Loosely correlated | +2.35% | ||
More | ||||
MOTE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MOTE has been loosely correlated with GEHC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MOTE jumps, then GEHC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MOTE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MOTE | 100% | N/A | ||
| GEHC - MOTE | 60% Loosely correlated | +3.37% | ||
| NXPI - MOTE | 53% Loosely correlated | +7.02% | ||
| MCHP - MOTE | 52% Loosely correlated | +12.38% | ||
| DHR - MOTE | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| USB - MOTE | 50% Loosely correlated | +1.37% | ||
More | ||||