Ad is loading...
CSM or GDIV or USMC
CSM vs GDIV vs USMC Comparison
Open Charts CSM vs GDIV vs USMC
ProShares Large Cap Core Plus
Price$64.66
Change+$1.02 (+1.60%)
Volume$8.52K
Net Assets433.31M
Harbor Dividend Growth Leaders ETF
Price$14.54
Change+$0.23 (+1.61%)
Volume$6.87K
Net Assets237.51M
Principal US Mega-Cap ETF
Price$58.16
Change+$0.95 (+1.66%)
Volume$90.15K
Net Assets2.64B
CSM vs GDIV vs USMC Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
USMC has more net assets: 2.64B vs. CSM (433M) and GDIV (238M). CSM has a higher annual dividend yield than USMC and GDIV: CSM (-1.987) vs USMC (-2.889) and GDIV (-4.352). CSM was incepted earlier than GDIV and USMC: CSM (16 years) vs GDIV (12 years) and USMC (8 years). USMC (0.12) has a lower expense ratio than CSM (0.45) and GDIV (0.50). GDIV and CSM has a higher turnover USMC (0.50) vs USMC (0.50).
| CSM | GDIV | USMC | |
| Gain YTD | -1.987 | -4.352 | -2.889 |
| Net Assets | 433M | 238M | 2.64B |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.50 | 0.12 |
| Turnover | 57.00 | 58.00 | 0.50 |
| Yield | 1.15 | 1.34 | 1.05 |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 12 years | 8 years |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CSM | GDIV | USMC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 76% | 19 days ago 73% | 14 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CSM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSM has been closely correlated with FTV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CSM jumps, then FTV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CSM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSM | 100% | +1.60% | ||
| FTV - CSM | 78% Closely correlated | +1.15% | ||
| BX - CSM | 78% Closely correlated | +3.02% | ||
| WAB - CSM | 77% Closely correlated | +2.39% | ||
| TRMB - CSM | 76% Closely correlated | +3.28% | ||
| MCHP - CSM | 76% Closely correlated | +4.20% | ||
More | ||||
GDIV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GDIV has been closely correlated with OWL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GDIV jumps, then OWL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GDIV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GDIV | 100% | +1.61% | ||
| OWL - GDIV | 75% Closely correlated | +2.74% | ||
| MAR - GDIV | 75% Closely correlated | +2.26% | ||
| BYD - GDIV | 69% Closely correlated | +2.47% | ||
| MTB - GDIV | 67% Closely correlated | +2.60% | ||
| META - GDIV | 66% Closely correlated | +4.34% | ||
More | ||||