Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSM or GFGF or LCTU
CSM vs GFGF vs LCTU Comparison
Open Charts CSM vs GFGF vs LCTU
ProShares Large Cap Core Plus
Price$71.95
Change+$0.37 (+0.52%)
Volume$103
Net Assets450.17M
Guru Favorite Stocks ETF
Price$32.65
Change+$0.05 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets34.55M
BlackRock US Carbon Transition Rdnss ETF
Price$68.86
Change+$0.44 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
CSM vs GFGF vs LCTU Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LCTU has more net assets: 1.3B vs. CSM (450M) and GFGF (34.5M). CSM has a higher annual dividend yield than LCTU and GFGF: CSM (9.401) vs LCTU (7.377) and GFGF (2.958). CSM was incepted earlier than GFGF and LCTU: CSM (16 years) vs GFGF (4 years) and LCTU (4 years). LCTU (0.14) has a lower expense ratio than CSM (0.45) and GFGF (0.65). CSM has a higher turnover LCTU (46.00) and GFGF (33.00) vs LCTU (46.00) and GFGF (33.00).
| CSM | GFGF | LCTU | |
| Gain YTD | 9.401 | 2.958 | 7.377 |
| Net Assets | 450M | 34.5M | 1.3B |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.65 | 0.14 |
| Turnover | 57.00 | 33.00 | 46.00 |
| Yield | 1.04 | 0.10 | 1.16 |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 4 years | 4 years |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CSM | GFGF | LCTU | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 66% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 85% | N/A | 13 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 75% | N/A | 6 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
GFGF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFGF has been closely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GFGF jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GFGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GFGF | 100% | N/A | ||
| MSFT - GFGF | 74% Closely correlated | -1.47% | ||
| APO - GFGF | 71% Closely correlated | +2.48% | ||
| AMZN - GFGF | 69% Closely correlated | +0.99% | ||
| INTU - GFGF | 69% Closely correlated | -1.99% | ||
| AMAT - GFGF | 66% Loosely correlated | -2.01% | ||
More | ||||
LCTU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LCTU has been closely correlated with AXP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LCTU jumps, then AXP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LCTU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LCTU | 100% | -0.53% | ||
| AXP - LCTU | 82% Closely correlated | -0.65% | ||
| GS - LCTU | 81% Closely correlated | -0.71% | ||
| KKR - LCTU | 81% Closely correlated | -1.70% | ||
| ARES - LCTU | 80% Closely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| MS - LCTU | 80% Closely correlated | -0.64% | ||
More | ||||