Ad is loading...
CSM or LGH or QVML
CSM vs LGH vs QVML Comparison
Open Charts CSM vs LGH vs QVML
ProShares Large Cap Core Plus
Price$62.77
Change+$0.24 (+0.38%)
Volume$300
Net Assets420.1M
HCM Defender 500 Index ETF
Price$47.09
Change+$0.24 (+0.51%)
Volume$302
Net Assets396.18M
Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF
Price$32.67
Change+$0.13 (+0.40%)
Volume$338
Net Assets1.12B
CSM vs LGH vs QVML Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QVML has more net assets: 1.12B vs. CSM (420M) and LGH (396M). CSM and QVML has a higher annual dividend yield than LGH: CSM (-5.210) and QVML (-5.452) vs LGH (-10.025). CSM was incepted earlier than LGH and QVML: CSM (16 years) vs LGH (6 years) and QVML (4 years). QVML (0.11) has a lower expense ratio than CSM (0.45) and LGH (1.06). LGH has a higher turnover CSM (57.00) and QVML (15.00) vs CSM (57.00) and QVML (15.00).
| CSM | LGH | QVML | |
| Gain YTD | -5.210 | -10.025 | -5.452 |
| Net Assets | 420M | 396M | 1.12B |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.06 | 0.11 |
| Turnover | 57.00 | 114.00 | 15.00 |
| Yield | 1.14 | 0.43 | 1.23 |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | 4 years |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CSM | LGH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 76% | 18 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
LGH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LGH has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LGH jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LGH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LGH | 100% | +1.60% | ||
| CDNS - LGH | 70% Closely correlated | +6.16% | ||
| LRCX - LGH | 69% Closely correlated | +6.25% | ||
| TT - LGH | 68% Closely correlated | +2.13% | ||
| SNPS - LGH | 67% Closely correlated | +3.95% | ||
| AMAT - LGH | 67% Closely correlated | +4.59% | ||
More | ||||
QVML and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QVML has been closely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QVML jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QVML | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QVML | 100% | +1.74% | ||
| MSFT - QVML | 70% Closely correlated | +3.45% | ||
| AAPL - QVML | 70% Closely correlated | +1.84% | ||
| PH - QVML | 69% Closely correlated | +2.75% | ||
| NXPI - QVML | 67% Closely correlated | +7.02% | ||
| BLK - QVML | 67% Closely correlated | +2.66% | ||
More | ||||