Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSM or MOTE or QLC
CSM vs MOTE vs QLC Comparison
Open Charts CSM vs MOTE vs QLC
ProShares Large Cap Core Plus
Price$68.53
Change+$0.14 (+0.20%)
Volume$354
Net Assets434.26M
VanEck Morningstar ESG Moat ETF
Price$27.48
Change+$0.23 (+0.84%)
Volume$100
Net Assets15.76M
FlexShares US Quality Large Cap ETF
Price$69.00
Change+$0.16 (+0.23%)
Volume$100
Net Assets497.15M
CSM vs MOTE vs QLC Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QLC has more net assets: 497M vs. CSM (434M) and MOTE (15.8M). CSM and QLC has a higher annual dividend yield than MOTE: CSM (3.810) and QLC (3.759) vs MOTE (-2.394). CSM was incepted earlier than MOTE and QLC: CSM (16 years) vs MOTE (4 years) and QLC (10 years). QLC (0.25) has a lower expense ratio than CSM (0.45) and MOTE (0.50). CSM has a higher turnover MOTE (38.00) and QLC (16.00) vs MOTE (38.00) and QLC (16.00).
| CSM | MOTE | QLC | |
| Gain YTD | 3.810 | -2.394 | 3.759 |
| Net Assets | 434M | 15.8M | 497M |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.50 | 0.25 |
| Turnover | 57.00 | 38.00 | 16.00 |
| Yield | 1.08 | 0.99 | 1.00 |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 4 years | 10 years |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CSM | QLC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 63% | 4 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 85% | 6 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 76% | 20 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
MOTE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MOTE has been loosely correlated with GEHC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MOTE jumps, then GEHC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MOTE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MOTE | 100% | +1.02% | ||
| GEHC - MOTE | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| DHR - MOTE | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.62% | ||
| USB - MOTE | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.22% | ||
| NXPI - MOTE | 52% Loosely correlated | +2.60% | ||
| MCHP - MOTE | 52% Loosely correlated | +4.29% | ||
More | ||||
QLC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLC has been closely correlated with WAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QLC jumps, then WAB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QLC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QLC | 100% | -0.12% | ||
| WAB - QLC | 79% Closely correlated | -0.42% | ||
| CRBG - QLC | 77% Closely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| ZBRA - QLC | 75% Closely correlated | +1.11% | ||
| FLEX - QLC | 73% Closely correlated | +1.51% | ||
| SYF - QLC | 73% Closely correlated | +2.72% | ||
More | ||||