Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSM or PRAY or SAMM
CSM vs PRAY vs SAMM Comparison
Open Charts CSM vs PRAY vs SAMM
ProShares Large Cap Core Plus
Price$68.40
Change+$0.82 (+1.21%)
Volume$5.42K
Net Assets429.33M
FIS Christian Stock ETF
Price$29.89
Change+$0.07 (+0.23%)
Volume$1.02K
Net Assets69.36M
Strategas Macro Momentum ETF
Price$26.48
Change+$0.28 (+1.07%)
Volume$100
Net Assets15.46M
CSM vs PRAY vs SAMM Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSM has more net assets: 429M vs. PRAY (69.4M) and SAMM (15.5M). CSM and PRAY has a higher annual dividend yield than SAMM: CSM (3.696) and PRAY (3.583) vs SAMM (-3.436). CSM was incepted earlier than PRAY and SAMM: CSM (16 years) vs PRAY (3 years) and SAMM (1 year). CSM (0.45) has a lower expense ratio than SAMM (0.66) and PRAY (0.69). SAMM has a higher turnover CSM (57.00) and PRAY (26.00) vs CSM (57.00) and PRAY (26.00).
| CSM | PRAY | SAMM | |
| Gain YTD | 3.696 | 3.583 | -3.436 |
| Net Assets | 429M | 69.4M | 15.5M |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.69 | 0.66 |
| Turnover | 57.00 | 26.00 | 122.00 |
| Yield | 1.08 | 0.74 | 0.74 |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 3 years | 1 year |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CSM | PRAY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
SAMM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAMM has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SAMM jumps, then GS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SAMM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAMM | 100% | -0.12% | ||
| GS - SAMM | 79% Closely correlated | +1.11% | ||
| PH - SAMM | 79% Closely correlated | -0.48% | ||
| MS - SAMM | 77% Closely correlated | +1.92% | ||
| CRH - SAMM | 74% Closely correlated | +2.11% | ||
| CMI - SAMM | 72% Closely correlated | +0.09% | ||
More | ||||