Advertisement
FVCB vs STI
Notable companies
Industry description
Market Cap
High and low price notable news
Volume
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Market Cap
High and low price notable news
Volume
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FVCB is a Hold and STI is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
STI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFVCB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- STI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- FVCB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FVCB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STI’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FVCB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- STI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
FVCB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.81% price change this week, while STI (@Electrical Products) price change was -14.57% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.78%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electrical Products industry was -3.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.79%.
Reported Earning Dates
FVCB is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.
STI is expected to report earnings on May 21, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (-1.75% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
@Electrical Products (-3.90% weekly)The industry produces a diverse range of electricity-powered equipment, appliances and components, catering to both households and industries. The products include power, distribution and specialty transformers; electric motors, generators and motor-generator sets; switchgear and switchboard apparatus; light bulbs, tubes, fittings and electric signs etc. Consumer income, construction spending, and industrial production are major drivers of demand for this industry’s products. Large companies tend to have economies of scale in production, marketing, and distribution, while smaller companies can potentially carve out their own market through niche or specialty offerings. The US electrical products manufacturing industry includes about 5,700 establishments (single-location companies and units of multi-location companies) with combined annual revenue of about $125 billion. (according to a study published in First Research). Emerson Electric Co., Hubbell Incorporated and Eaton Corporation plc are major electrical products makers in the U.S.
| FVCB | STI | FVCB / STI | |
| Capitalization | 218M | 225M | 97% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.452 | -88.718 | -3% |
| P/E Ratio | 57.21 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 42.1M | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 114M | N/A | - |
STI | FVCB | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 81 | 81 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 98 Overvalued | 49 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 63 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 46 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 29 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 41 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FVCB's Valuation (49) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STI (98). This means that FVCB’s stock grew somewhat faster than STI’s over the last 12 months.
FVCB's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STI (100). This means that FVCB’s stock grew somewhat faster than STI’s over the last 12 months.
FVCB's SMR Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STI (97). This means that FVCB’s stock grew somewhat faster than STI’s over the last 12 months.
FVCB's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as STI (65). This means that FVCB’s stock grew similarly to STI’s over the last 12 months.
STI's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FVCB (99). This means that STI’s stock grew significantly faster than FVCB’s over the last 12 months.
| FVCB | STI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 42% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 45% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 64% | 11 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 4 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 34% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 34% |
Advertisement
FVCB and Stocks
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FVCB has been loosely correlated with MCBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FVCB jumps, then MCBS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FVCB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FVCB | 100% | -0.31% | ||
| MCBS - FVCB | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.82% | ||
| AROW - FVCB | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.02% | ||
| PFIS - FVCB | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.14% | ||
| HTB - FVCB | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.22% | ||
| GSBC - FVCB | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.94% | ||
More | ||||
STI and Stocks
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that STI and NEOV have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that STI and NEOV's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To STI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| STI | 100% | -0.76% | ||
| NEOV - STI | 22% Poorly correlated | -2.07% | ||
| SLDP - STI | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.63% | ||
| AMPX - STI | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.14% | ||
| AEIS - STI | 16% Poorly correlated | -3.57% | ||
| AYI - STI | 12% Poorly correlated | -1.27% | ||
More | ||||