Ad is loading...
FBGRX or FCNTX or FTRNX
FBGRX vs FCNTX vs FTRNX Comparison
Open Charts FBGRX vs FCNTX vs FTRNX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth
Price$198.70
Change-$0.70 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets64.44B
FBGRX vs FCNTX vs FTRNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCNTX has more cash in the bank: 145B vs. FBGRX (64.4B) and FTRNX (3.45B). FTRNX pays higher dividends than FBGRX and FCNTX: FTRNX (0.65) vs FBGRX (0.25) and FCNTX (0.06). FBGRX was incepted earlier than FCNTX and FTRNX: FBGRX (37 years) vs FCNTX (58 years) and FTRNX (67 years). FCNTX (0.63) is less costly to investors than FTRNX (0.59) and FBGRX (0.47). FTRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. FBGRX (22.00) and FCNTX (18.00). FBGRX (0), FCNTX (0) and FTRNX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCNTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.73 vs. FBGRX (3.33) and FTRNX (-4.64). FBGRX return over 5 years is better than : 90.21 vs. FCNTX (55.59) and FTRNX (50.07).
| FBGRX | FCNTX | FTRNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.63 | 0.59 |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.63 | 0.59 |
| Fund Existence | 37 years | 58 years | 67 years |
| Gain YTD | -12.224 | -3.947 | -13.616 |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Net Assets | 64.4B | 145B | 3.45B |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 0.06 | 0.65 |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.33 | 11.73 | -4.64 |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.21 | 38.32 | 22.27 |
| Returns for 5 years | 90.21 | 55.59 | 50.07 |
| Returns for 10 years | 175.75 | 101.83 | 79.74 |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...