Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBGRX or FCNTX or FTRNX
FBGRX vs FCNTX vs FTRNX Comparison
Open Charts FBGRX vs FCNTX vs FTRNX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth
Price$241.62
Change-$5.89 (-2.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.77B
FBGRX vs FCNTX vs FTRNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCNTX has more cash in the bank: 173B vs. FBGRX (79.8B) and FTRNX (4.12B). FTRNX pays higher dividends than FBGRX and FCNTX: FTRNX (0.53) vs FBGRX (0.20) and FCNTX (0.05). FBGRX was incepted earlier than FCNTX and FTRNX: FBGRX (38 years) vs FCNTX (58 years) and FTRNX (67 years). FCNTX (0.63) is less costly to investors than FTRNX (0.59) and FBGRX (0.47). FTRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. FBGRX (22.00) and FCNTX (18.00). FBGRX (0), FCNTX (0) and FTRNX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCNTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.96 vs. FBGRX (15.86) and FTRNX (9.29). FBGRX return over 5 years is better than : 78.77 vs. FTRNX (52.84) and FCNTX (49.65).
| FBGRX | FCNTX | FTRNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.63 | 0.59 |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.63 | 0.59 |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 58 years | 67 years |
| Gain YTD | 8.421 | 12.506 | 9.143 |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Net Assets | 79.8B | 173B | 4.12B |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.05 | 0.53 |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.86 | 18.96 | 9.29 |
| Returns for 3 years | 85.81 | 65.71 | 54.03 |
| Returns for 5 years | 78.77 | 49.65 | 52.84 |
| Returns for 10 years | 229.34 | 127.07 | 121.02 |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement