Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBGRX or FSPTX or PSLDX
FBGRX vs FSPTX vs PSLDX Comparison
Open Charts FBGRX vs FSPTX vs PSLDX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth
Price$220.86
Change+$1.88 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.84B
Fidelity Select Technology
Price$34.87
Change+$0.34 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.61B
PIMCO StocksPLUS® Long Duration Instl
Price$15.71
Change-$0.04 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets524.97M
FBGRX vs FSPTX vs PSLDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBGRX has more cash in the bank: 70.8B vs. FSPTX (15.6B) and PSLDX (525M). PSLDX pays higher dividends than FBGRX and FSPTX: PSLDX (15.56) vs FBGRX (0.23) and FSPTX (0.00). FBGRX was incepted earlier than FSPTX and PSLDX: FBGRX (37 years) vs FSPTX (44 years) and PSLDX (18 years). PSLDX (2.88) is less costly to investors than FSPTX (0.62) and FBGRX (0.47). PSLDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. FSPTX (44.00) and FBGRX (22.00). FBGRX and FSPTX has a lower initial minimum investment than PSLDX: FBGRX (0) and FSPTX (0) vs PSLDX (1000000). PSLDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.47 vs. FBGRX (5.51) and FSPTX (4.60). FBGRX return over 5 years is better than : 79.34 vs. FSPTX (59.59) and PSLDX (16.53).
| FBGRX | FSPTX | PSLDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.62 | 2.88 |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.62 | 2.88 |
| Fund Existence | 37 years | 44 years | 18 years |
| Gain YTD | -3.605 | -6.372 | -0.973 |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | 1000000 |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Net Assets | 70.8B | 15.6B | 525M |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.00 | 15.56 |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.51 | 4.60 | 9.47 |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.49 | 67.32 | 20.91 |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.34 | 59.59 | 16.53 |
| Returns for 10 years | 199.84 | 177.15 | 83.96 |