Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBNDX or FTBFX or VBTLX
FBNDX vs FTBFX vs VBTLX Comparison
Open Charts FBNDX vs FTBFX vs VBTLX
Fidelity Investment Grade Bond
Price$7.18
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.09B
Fidelity Total Bond Fund
Price$9.50
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.92B
Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Adm
Price$9.59
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets352.01B
FBNDX vs FTBFX vs VBTLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VBTLX has more cash in the bank: 352B vs. FTBFX (38.9B) and FBNDX (10.1B). FTBFX pays higher dividends than FBNDX and VBTLX: FTBFX (4.49) vs FBNDX (3.94) and VBTLX (3.79). FBNDX was incepted earlier than FTBFX and VBTLX: FBNDX (54 years) vs FTBFX (23 years) and VBTLX (24 years). FBNDX (0.44) and FTBFX (0.44) is less costly to investors than VBTLX (0.04). FBNDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 232.00 vs. FTBFX (206.00) and VBTLX (36.00). FBNDX and FTBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than VBTLX: FBNDX (0) and FTBFX (0) vs VBTLX (3000). FTBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.67 vs. FBNDX (4.29) and VBTLX (0.86). FTBFX return over 5 years is better than : -0.63 vs. FBNDX (-5.05) and VBTLX (-16.86).
| FBNDX | FTBFX | VBTLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.04 |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.04 |
| Fund Existence | 54 years | 23 years | 24 years |
| Gain YTD | 3.055 | 2.890 | 1.495 |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | 3000 |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Net Assets | 10.1B | 38.9B | 352B |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.94 | 4.49 | 3.79 |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.29 | 4.67 | 0.86 |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.27 | 11.90 | -1.19 |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.05 | -0.63 | -16.86 |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.18 | 23.12 | -8.61 |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement