FC
Price
$22.64
Change
-$0.06 (-0.26%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
520.87M
10 days until earnings call
MLP
Price
$17.31
Change
-$0.80 (-4.42%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
424.13M
PT
Price
$0.89
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
17.38M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FC or MLP or PT

Header iconFC vs MLP vs PT Comparison
Open Charts FC vs MLP vs PTBanner chart's image
Franklin Covey
Price$22.64
Change-$0.06 (-0.26%)
Volume$105.92K
Capitalization520.87M
Maui Land & Pineapple
Price$17.31
Change-$0.80 (-4.42%)
Volume$31.88K
Capitalization424.13M
Pintec Technology Holdings
Price$0.89
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.18K
Capitalization17.38M
FC vs MLP vs PT Comparison Chart
Loading...
FC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MLP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2025
Stock price -- (FC: $22.64MLP: $17.31PT: $0.89)
Brand notoriety: FC, MLP and PT are all not notable
FC represents the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry, MLP is part of the Real Estate Development industry, and PT is in the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry.
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FC: 114%, MLP: 166%, PT: 14%
Market capitalization -- FC: $520.87M, MLP: $424.13M, PT: $17.38M
FC [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $520.87M. MLP’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $424.13M. PT [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] has a market capitalization of $17.38M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $80.94B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $5.57B. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.6B. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $13.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMLP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and PT’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MLP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MLP is a better buy in the long-term than FC, which in turn is a better option than PT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MLP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and PT’s TA Score reflects 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MLP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FC is a better buy in the short-term than MLP, which in turn is a better option than PT.

Price Growth

FC (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а -0.31% price change this week, while MLP (@Real Estate Development) price change was +2.67% , and PT (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price fluctuated -3.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was -1.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.51%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +1.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.02%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was -0.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.67%.

Reported Earning Dates

FC is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

MLP is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2025.

PT is expected to report earnings on Apr 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (-1.98% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

@Real Estate Development (+1.16% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (-0.50% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FC($521M) has a higher market cap than MLP($424M) and PT($17.4M). MLP has higher P/E ratio than FC and PT: MLP (294.12) vs FC (29.38) and PT (). PT YTD gains are higher at: -1.144 vs. MLP (-21.247) and FC (-39.755). FC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 35.9M vs. MLP (-2.21M) and PT (-57.14M). PT has more cash in the bank: 231M vs. FC (34M) and MLP (8.37M). MLP has less debt than FC and PT: MLP (800K) vs FC (13.2M) and PT (400M). FC has higher revenues than PT and MLP: FC (280M) vs PT (173M) and MLP (10.9M).
FCMLPPT
Capitalization521M424M17.4M
EBITDA35.9M-2.21M-57.14M
Gain YTD-39.755-21.247-1.144
P/E Ratio29.38294.12N/A
Revenue280M10.9M173M
Total Cash34M8.37M231M
Total Debt13.2M800K400M
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FC vs MLP vs PT: Fundamental Ratings
FC
MLP
PT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
144376
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
94
Overvalued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8757100
SMR RATING
1..100
399199
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
865777
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
912100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9550n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PT's Valuation (51) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as FC (73) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for MLP (94) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that PT's stock grew similarly to FC’s and somewhat faster than MLP’s over the last 12 months.

MLP's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as FC (87) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for PT (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that MLP's stock grew similarly to FC’s and somewhat faster than PT’s over the last 12 months.

FC's SMR Rating (39) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MLP (91) in the Real Estate Development industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for PT (99) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FC's stock grew somewhat faster than MLP’s and somewhat faster than PT’s over the last 12 months.

MLP's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as PT (77) in the Packaged Software industry, and is in the same range as FC (86) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that MLP's stock grew similarly to PT’s and similarly to FC’s over the last 12 months.

MLP's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Real Estate Development industry is significantly better than the same rating for FC (91) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for PT (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that MLP's stock grew significantly faster than FC’s and significantly faster than PT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCMLPPT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
69%
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MLP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DENN4.130.09
+2.23%
Denny's Corp
ALRM56.64-0.84
-1.46%
Alarm.com Holdings
DKNG36.50-1.48
-3.90%
DraftKings
FWRG15.02-0.81
-5.12%
First Watch Restaurant Group
MINM2.65-0.40
-13.11%
Minim Inc