Ad is loading...
FNCMX or VITAX or VTSAX
FNCMX vs VITAX vs VTSAX Comparison
Open Charts FNCMX vs VITAX vs VTSAX
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index
Price$227.60
Change+$0.01 (+0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.85B
Vanguard Information Technology Idx Adm
Price$306.45
Change+$13.93 (+4.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets90.18B
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx Adm
Price$139.80
Change+$4.48 (+3.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.72T
FNCMX vs VITAX vs VTSAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSAX has more cash in the bank: 1.72T vs. VITAX (90.2B) and FNCMX (16.9B). VTSAX pays higher dividends than FNCMX and VITAX: VTSAX (1.36) vs FNCMX (0.67) and VITAX (0.58). FNCMX was incepted earlier than VITAX and VTSAX: FNCMX (22 years) vs VITAX (21 years) and VTSAX (25 years). FNCMX (0.30) is less costly to investors than VITAX (0.09) and VTSAX (0.04). VITAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.00 vs. FNCMX (2.00) and VTSAX (2.00). FNCMX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTSAX and VITAX: FNCMX (0) vs VTSAX (3000) and VITAX (100000). VITAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.14 vs. FNCMX (10.33) and VTSAX (7.83). VITAX return over 5 years is better than : 127.33 vs. FNCMX (104.88) and VTSAX (97.30).
| FNCMX | VITAX | VTSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.09 | 0.04 |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.09 | 0.04 |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 21 years | 25 years |
| Gain YTD | -7.015 | -8.091 | -4.018 |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | 3000 |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Net Assets | 16.9B | 90.2B | 1.72T |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 0.58 | 1.36 |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.33 | 11.14 | 7.83 |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.97 | 62.42 | 38.74 |
| Returns for 5 years | 104.88 | 127.33 | 97.30 |
| Returns for 10 years | 258.61 | 428.13 | 162.86 |