Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSGGX or FSPSX or VTMGX
FSGGX vs FSPSX vs VTMGX Comparison
Open Charts FSGGX vs FSPSX vs VTMGX
Fidelity Global ex US Index
Price$17.03
Change-$0.19 (-1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.86B
Fidelity International Index
Price$56.76
Change-$0.61 (-1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets64.89B
Vanguard Developed Markets Index Admiral
Price$18.29
Change+$0.13 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets232.17B
FSGGX vs FSPSX vs VTMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTMGX has more cash in the bank: 232B vs. FSPSX (64.9B) and FSGGX (12.9B). VTMGX pays higher dividends than FSGGX and FSPSX: VTMGX (2.68) vs FSGGX (2.45) and FSPSX (2.40). FSGGX was incepted earlier than FSPSX and VTMGX: FSGGX (14 years) vs FSPSX (14 years) and VTMGX (26 years). FSGGX (0.06) is less costly to investors than VTMGX (0.05) and FSPSX (0.04). FSPSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 4.00 vs. FSGGX (3.00) and VTMGX (3.00). FSGGX and FSPSX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTMGX: FSGGX (0) and FSPSX (0) vs VTMGX (3000). FSGGX and FSPSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.18 and 15.74 vs. VTMGX (13.08). FSPSX return over 5 years is better than : 67.98 vs. FSGGX (57.35) and VTMGX (47.47).
| FSGGX | FSPSX | VTMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.05 |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.05 |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 14 years | 26 years |
| Gain YTD | 19.417 | 20.677 | 18.528 |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | 3000 |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Net Assets | 12.9B | 64.9B | 232B |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.45 | 2.40 | 2.68 |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.18 | 15.74 | 13.08 |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.29 | 57.27 | 41.01 |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.35 | 67.98 | 47.47 |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.32 | 71.01 | 49.74 |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement