Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSKAX or FSMDX or MATFX
FSKAX vs FSMDX vs MATFX Comparison
Open Charts FSKAX vs FSMDX vs MATFX
Fidelity Total Market Index
Price$174.88
Change-$0.43 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets113.87B
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$35.51
Change-$0.14 (-0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.39B
Matthews Asia Innovators Investor
Price$15.30
Change-$0.04 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets296.86M
FSKAX vs FSMDX vs MATFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSKAX has more cash in the bank: 114B vs. FSMDX (43.4B) and MATFX (297M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than FSKAX and MATFX: FSMDX (1.29) vs FSKAX (1.01) and MATFX (0.00). FSKAX was incepted earlier than FSMDX and MATFX: FSKAX (14 years) vs FSMDX (14 years) and MATFX (26 years). MATFX (1.29) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03) and FSKAX (0.01). MATFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 257.92 vs. FSMDX (15.00) and FSKAX (3.00). FSKAX and FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than MATFX: FSKAX (0) and FSMDX (0) vs MATFX (2500). MATFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.33 vs. FSKAX (20.78) and FSMDX (13.54). FSKAX return over 5 years is better than : 96.81 vs. FSMDX (63.59) and MATFX (-23.30).
| FSKAX | FSMDX | MATFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.03 | 1.29 |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.03 | 1.29 |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 14 years | 26 years |
| Gain YTD | 8.788 | 5.823 | 18.547 |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | 2500 |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Net Assets | 114B | 43.4B | 297M |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.01 | 1.29 | 0.00 |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.78 | 13.54 | 25.33 |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.53 | 29.45 | 2.40 |
| Returns for 5 years | 96.81 | 63.59 | -23.30 |
| Returns for 10 years | 234.30 | 120.02 | 15.23 |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement