Advertisement
HBM or PZG or TMQ
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HBM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePZG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and TMQ’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).
- HBM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PZG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- TMQ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HBM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PZG’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s), and TMQ’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HBM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- PZG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- TMQ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
HBM (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +10.11% price change this week, while PZG (@Precious Metals) price change was -4.75% , and TMQ (@Other Metals/Minerals) price fluctuated +0.70% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +33.53%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.29%.
Reported Earning Dates
HBM is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.
PZG is expected to report earnings on Sep 24, 2025.
TMQ is expected to report earnings on Oct 08, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.56% weekly)The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
@Precious Metals (+0.03% weekly)The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.
| HBM | PZG | TMQ | |
| Capitalization | 2.45B | 24.5M | 82.8M |
| EBITDA | 621M | -6.29M | -7.21M |
| Gain YTD | 30.370 | 72.778 | 24.138 |
| P/E Ratio | 31.73 | N/A | N/A |
| Revenue | 1.69B | 0 | 0 |
| Total Cash | 251M | 8.57M | 2.59M |
| Total Debt | 1.38B | 11.4M | 33K |
HBM | PZG | TMQ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 86 | 88 | 24 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 75 Overvalued | 34 Fair valued | 46 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 32 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 80 | 95 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 36 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 84 | 100 | 17 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PZG's Valuation (34) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as TMQ (46) and is somewhat better than the same rating for HBM (75). This means that PZG's stock grew similarly to TMQ’s and somewhat faster than HBM’s over the last 12 months.
HBM's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is significantly better than the same rating for PZG (100) and is significantly better than the same rating for TMQ (100). This means that HBM's stock grew significantly faster than PZG’s and significantly faster than TMQ’s over the last 12 months.
HBM's SMR Rating (80) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as TMQ (92) and is in the same range as PZG (95). This means that HBM's stock grew similarly to TMQ’s and similarly to PZG’s over the last 12 months.
PZG's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as TMQ (38) and is in the same range as HBM (42). This means that PZG's stock grew similarly to TMQ’s and similarly to HBM’s over the last 12 months.
TMQ's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is significantly better than the same rating for HBM (84) and is significantly better than the same rating for PZG (100). This means that TMQ's stock grew significantly faster than HBM’s and significantly faster than PZG’s over the last 12 months.
| HBM | PZG | TMQ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 77% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 75% | 10 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 69% |
Advertisement
HBM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HBM has been closely correlated with TECK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HBM jumps, then TECK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HBM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HBM | 100% | -1.31% | ||
| TECK - HBM | 81% Closely correlated | -2.29% | ||
| SCCO - HBM | 81% Closely correlated | -2.04% | ||
| LUNMF - HBM | 81% Closely correlated | -2.80% | ||
| FCX - HBM | 80% Closely correlated | -1.33% | ||
| ERO - HBM | 76% Closely correlated | -2.78% | ||
More | ||||
PZG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PZG has been loosely correlated with DNCVF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PZG jumps, then DNCVF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PZG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PZG | 100% | -4.28% | ||
| DNCVF - PZG | 35% Loosely correlated | -4.60% | ||
| TGMR - PZG | 34% Loosely correlated | +3.65% | ||
| NG - PZG | 33% Loosely correlated | -1.69% | ||
| DSVSF - PZG | 31% Poorly correlated | -7.02% | ||
| GSVRF - PZG | 30% Poorly correlated | -5.68% | ||
More | ||||
TMQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMQ has been loosely correlated with NAK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TMQ jumps, then NAK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TMQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMQ | 100% | N/A | ||
| NAK - TMQ | 40% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| GENMF - TMQ | 33% Poorly correlated | -7.14% | ||
| HBM - TMQ | 29% Poorly correlated | -1.31% | ||
| GPPRF - TMQ | 28% Poorly correlated | -4.40% | ||
| MTRN - TMQ | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.09% | ||
More | ||||