Advertisement
HFWA or NFBK or OPOF
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HFWA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNFBK’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s), and OPOF’s FA Score reflects 3 green FA rating(s).
- HFWA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- NFBK’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- OPOF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HFWA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NFBK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and OPOF’s TA Score reflects 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HFWA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 8 bearish.
- NFBK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- OPOF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
HFWA (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.36% price change this week, while NFBK (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.83% , and OPOF (@Regional Banks) price fluctuated +0.69% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.95%.
Reported Earning Dates
HFWA is expected to report earnings on Jul 17, 2025.
NFBK is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.
OPOF is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (-0.53% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| HFWA | NFBK | OPOF | |
| Capitalization | 672M | 430M | 89.7M |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Gain YTD | -5.252 | 3.954 | 51.774 |
| P/E Ratio | 10.83 | 11.26 | 11.56 |
| Revenue | 244M | 137M | 60.9M |
| Total Cash | 55.9M | 13.3M | 14.5M |
| Total Debt | 21.8M | 836M | 99.1M |
HFWA | NFBK | OPOF | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 65 | 24 | 80 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 41 Fair valued | 26 Undervalued | 100 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 61 | 67 | 18 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 11 | 12 | 18 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 48 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 28 | 16 | 12 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 75 | 19 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NFBK's Valuation (26) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HFWA (41) and is significantly better than the same rating for OPOF (100). This means that NFBK's stock grew similarly to HFWA’s and significantly faster than OPOF’s over the last 12 months.
OPOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HFWA (61) and is somewhat better than the same rating for NFBK (67). This means that OPOF's stock grew somewhat faster than HFWA’s and somewhat faster than NFBK’s over the last 12 months.
HFWA's SMR Rating (11) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NFBK (12) and is in the same range as OPOF (18). This means that HFWA's stock grew similarly to NFBK’s and similarly to OPOF’s over the last 12 months.
OPOF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NFBK (48) and is in the same range as HFWA (56). This means that OPOF's stock grew similarly to NFBK’s and similarly to HFWA’s over the last 12 months.
OPOF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NFBK (16) and is in the same range as HFWA (28). This means that OPOF's stock grew similarly to NFBK’s and similarly to HFWA’s over the last 12 months.
| HFWA | NFBK | OPOF | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 56% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 44% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 67% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 50% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 65% | 10 days ago 58% | 5 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 14 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 50% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | N/A | 3 days ago 53% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 75% |
Advertisement
HFWA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HFWA has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HFWA jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HFWA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HFWA | 100% | -2.74% | ||
| UBSI - HFWA | 91% Closely correlated | -2.03% | ||
| HOPE - HFWA | 90% Closely correlated | -2.97% | ||
| NWBI - HFWA | 90% Closely correlated | -2.08% | ||
| BANR - HFWA | 89% Closely correlated | -1.32% | ||
| FFBC - HFWA | 89% Closely correlated | -2.26% | ||
More | ||||
NFBK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NFBK has been closely correlated with NWBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NFBK jumps, then NWBI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NFBK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NFBK | 100% | -3.28% | ||
| NWBI - NFBK | 86% Closely correlated | -2.08% | ||
| TCBK - NFBK | 86% Closely correlated | -2.97% | ||
| STBA - NFBK | 86% Closely correlated | -2.23% | ||
| FMBH - NFBK | 85% Closely correlated | -3.27% | ||
| FFBC - NFBK | 85% Closely correlated | -2.26% | ||
More | ||||
OPOF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that OPOF and FISI have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OPOF and FISI's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OPOF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OPOF | 100% | -0.46% | ||
| FISI - OPOF | 33% Poorly correlated | -3.07% | ||
| PCB - OPOF | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.55% | ||
| BMRC - OPOF | 32% Poorly correlated | -2.80% | ||
| OVLY - OPOF | 29% Poorly correlated | -2.35% | ||
| INBK - OPOF | 27% Poorly correlated | -3.20% | ||
More | ||||