Advertisement
IBM or MSFT or QQQ
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IBM’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileMSFT’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).
- IBM’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
- MSFT’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
IBM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MSFT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- IBM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- MSFT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
IBM (@Information Technology Services) experienced а +0.60% price change this week, while MSFT (@Packaged Software) price change was +1.61% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was +1.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.15%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +55.95%.
Reported Earning Dates
IBM is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.
MSFT is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Information Technology Services (+1.66% weekly)The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.
@Packaged Software (-0.20% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
IBM | MSFT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 25 | 23 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 10 Undervalued | 21 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 3 | 12 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 42 | 29 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 11 | 23 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 6 | 58 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
IBM's Valuation (10) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as MSFT (21) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that IBM’s stock grew similarly to MSFT’s over the last 12 months.
IBM's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as MSFT (12) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that IBM’s stock grew similarly to MSFT’s over the last 12 months.
MSFT's SMR Rating (29) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as IBM (42) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that MSFT’s stock grew similarly to IBM’s over the last 12 months.
IBM's Price Growth Rating (11) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as MSFT (23) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that IBM’s stock grew similarly to MSFT’s over the last 12 months.
IBM's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MSFT (58) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that IBM’s stock grew somewhat faster than MSFT’s over the last 12 months.
| IBM | MSFT | QQQ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 37% | 2 days ago 34% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 8 days ago 66% | 10 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 44% | about 1 month ago 49% | 2 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 88% |
Advertisement
QQQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QQQ has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QQQ jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QQQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QQQ | 100% | -0.02% | ||
| LRCX - QQQ | 81% Closely correlated | -0.21% | ||
| CDNS - QQQ | 80% Closely correlated | -0.72% | ||
| KLAC - QQQ | 79% Closely correlated | -2.38% | ||
| META - QQQ | 78% Closely correlated | -0.21% | ||
| SNPS - QQQ | 78% Closely correlated | -0.37% | ||
More | ||||