Ad is loading...
PRDGX or TRBCX or VDADX
PRDGX vs TRBCX vs VDADX Comparison
Open Charts PRDGX vs TRBCX vs VDADX
T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth
Price$76.19
Change-$0.06 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.61B
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth
Price$171.33
Change+$2.35 (+1.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets56.59B
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Adm
Price$51.20
Change+$0.10 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets102.29B
PRDGX vs TRBCX vs VDADX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VDADX has more cash in the bank: 102B vs. TRBCX (56.6B) and PRDGX (22.6B). VDADX pays higher dividends than PRDGX and TRBCX: VDADX (1.81) vs PRDGX (0.98) and TRBCX (0.00). PRDGX was incepted earlier than TRBCX and VDADX: PRDGX (32 years) vs TRBCX (32 years) and VDADX (11 years). TRBCX (0.70) is less costly to investors than PRDGX (0.64) and VDADX (0.07). PRDGX and TRBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.90 and 15.70 vs. VDADX (13.00). PRDGX and TRBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VDADX: PRDGX (2500) and TRBCX (2500) vs VDADX (3000). VDADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.35 vs. TRBCX (5.00) and PRDGX (3.34). PRDGX and VDADX return over 5 years is better than : 71.37 and 68.70 vs. TRBCX (42.31).
| PRDGX | TRBCX | VDADX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.70 | 0.07 |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.70 | 0.07 |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 32 years | 11 years |
| Gain YTD | -0.636 | -8.016 | -3.651 |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 3000 |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Net Assets | 22.6B | 56.6B | 102B |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.98 | 0.00 | 1.81 |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.34 | 5.00 | 7.35 |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.96 | 28.75 | 22.22 |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.37 | 42.31 | 68.70 |
| Returns for 10 years | 125.17 | 136.98 | 132.35 |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers