Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RERGX or VTSNX or VTWAX
RERGX vs VTSNX vs VTWAX Comparison
Open Charts RERGX vs VTSNX vs VTWAX
American Funds EUPAC R6
Price$59.87
Change-$0.48 (-0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets130.86B
Vanguard Total Intl Stock Index I
Price$146.48
Change-$0.51 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets510.79B
Vanguard Total World Stock Index Admiral
Price$45.98
Change-$0.25 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.3B
RERGX vs VTSNX vs VTWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSNX has more cash in the bank: 511B vs. RERGX (131B) and VTWAX (63.3B). VTSNX pays higher dividends than VTWAX and RERGX: VTSNX (2.85) vs VTWAX (1.73) and RERGX (0.96). RERGX was incepted earlier than VTSNX and VTWAX: RERGX (16 years) vs VTSNX (15 years) and VTWAX (6 years). RERGX (0.47) is less costly to investors than VTWAX (0.09) and VTSNX (0.06). RERGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. VTSNX (3.00) and VTWAX (3.00). RERGX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTWAX and VTSNX: RERGX (250) vs VTWAX (3000) and VTSNX (5000000). VTWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.94 vs. VTSNX (12.52) and RERGX (4.45). VTWAX return over 5 years is better than : 67.64 vs. VTSNX (40.20) and RERGX (12.87).
| RERGX | VTSNX | VTWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.06 | 0.09 |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.06 | 0.09 |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 15 years | 6 years |
| Gain YTD | 11.448 | 17.350 | 11.293 |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000000 | 3000 |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Net Assets | 131B | 511B | 63.3B |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 2.85 | 1.73 |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.45 | 12.52 | 13.94 |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.45 | 32.98 | 44.55 |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.87 | 40.20 | 67.64 |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.73 | 50.08 | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement