Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RERGX or VTSNX or VTWAX
RERGX vs VTSNX vs VTWAX Comparison
Open Charts RERGX vs VTSNX vs VTWAX
American Funds EUPAC R6
Price$60.75
Change+$0.03 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets133.45B
Vanguard Total Intl Stock Index I
Price$146.05
Change+$0.47 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets492.72B
Vanguard Total World Stock Index Admiral
Price$44.41
Change+$0.34 (+0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets59.83B
RERGX vs VTSNX vs VTWAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSNX has more cash in the bank: 493B vs. RERGX (133B) and VTWAX (59.8B). VTSNX pays higher dividends than VTWAX and RERGX: VTSNX (2.91) vs VTWAX (1.80) and RERGX (1.37). RERGX was incepted earlier than VTSNX and VTWAX: RERGX (16 years) vs VTSNX (15 years) and VTWAX (6 years). RERGX (0.47) is less costly to investors than VTWAX (0.09) and VTSNX (0.06). RERGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. VTSNX (3.00) and VTWAX (3.00). RERGX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTWAX and VTSNX: RERGX (250) vs VTWAX (3000) and VTSNX (5000000). VTWAX and VTSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.88 and 10.59 vs. RERGX (3.37). VTWAX return over 5 years is better than : 62.49 vs. VTSNX (38.75) and RERGX (19.87).
| RERGX | VTSNX | VTWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.06 | 0.09 |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.06 | 0.09 |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 15 years | 6 years |
| Gain YTD | 13.031 | 15.015 | 6.036 |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000000 | 3000 |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Net Assets | 133B | 493B | 59.8B |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 2.91 | 1.80 |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.37 | 10.59 | 10.88 |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.05 | 22.64 | 33.26 |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.87 | 38.75 | 62.49 |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.55 | 43.60 | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement