Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RERGX or VTSNX or VTWAX
RERGX vs VTSNX vs VTWAX Comparison
Open Charts RERGX vs VTSNX vs VTWAX
American Funds EUPAC R6
Price$60.48
Change-$0.24 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.03B
Vanguard Total Intl Stock Index I
Price$148.39
Change+$0.02 (+0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets492.72B
Vanguard Total World Stock Index Admiral
Price$45.50
Change-$0.02 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets59.83B
RERGX vs VTSNX vs VTWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSNX has more cash in the bank: 493B vs. RERGX (135B) and VTWAX (59.8B). VTSNX pays higher dividends than VTWAX and RERGX: VTSNX (2.82) vs VTWAX (1.74) and RERGX (0.95). RERGX was incepted earlier than VTSNX and VTWAX: RERGX (16 years) vs VTSNX (15 years) and VTWAX (6 years). RERGX (0.47) is less costly to investors than VTWAX (0.09) and VTSNX (0.06). RERGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. VTSNX (3.00) and VTWAX (3.00). RERGX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTWAX and VTSNX: RERGX (250) vs VTWAX (3000) and VTSNX (5000000). VTSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.46 vs. VTWAX (14.08) and RERGX (6.94). VTWAX return over 5 years is better than : 72.02 vs. VTSNX (43.81) and RERGX (19.76).
| RERGX | VTSNX | VTWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.06 | 0.09 |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.06 | 0.09 |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 15 years | 6 years |
| Gain YTD | 12.770 | 17.429 | 9.126 |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000000 | 3000 |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Net Assets | 135B | 493B | 59.8B |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 2.82 | 1.74 |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.94 | 15.46 | 14.08 |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.28 | 38.16 | 50.61 |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.76 | 43.81 | 72.02 |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.64 | 47.71 | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement