Ad is loading...
AAATX vs FCIFX
AAATX vs FCIFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AAATX vs. FCIFX commentary
May 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AAATX is a Hold and FCIFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AAATX has more cash in the bank: 3.79B vs. FCIFX (211M). AAATX pays higher dividends than FCIFX: AAATX (2.91) vs FCIFX (2.65). AAATX was incepted earlier than FCIFX: AAATX (18 years) vs FCIFX (22 years). AAATX (0.61) is less costly to investors than FCIFX (0.48). FCIFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.00 vs. AAATX (8.00). FCIFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AAATX: FCIFX (0) vs AAATX (250). FCIFX (7.53) and AAATX (7.49) have marching annual gain over last year. AAATX return over 5 years is better than : 21.36 vs. FCIFX (7.19).
| AAATX | FCIFX | AAATX / FCIFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.48 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.48 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.759 | 2.619 | 105% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.79B | 211M | 1,798% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.91 | 2.65 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.49 | 7.53 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.35 | 8.54 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.36 | 7.19 | 297% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.36 | 1.47 | 1,935% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...