Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AABCX vs RLBCX
AABCX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts AABCX vs RLBCX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal C
Price$16.77
Change+$0.02 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.34B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$38.77
Change+$0.06 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.73B
AABCX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AABCX vs. RLBCX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AABCX is a Hold and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 266B vs. AABCX (2.34B). AABCX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: AABCX (2.15) vs RLBCX (1.49). AABCX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: AABCX (31 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). AABCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). AABCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). AABCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: AABCX (0) vs RLBCX (250). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.24 vs. AABCX (2.46). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 41.76 vs. AABCX (17.34).
| AABCX | RLBCX | AABCX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.89 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.89 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.106 | 14.423 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.34B | 266B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.15 | 1.49 | 145% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.46 | 9.24 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.90 | 50.17 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.34 | 41.76 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.20 | 73.69 | 42% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement