Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AABCX vs RLBCX
AABCX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts AABCX vs RLBCX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal C
Price$16.11
Change+$0.06 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.24B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$36.64
Change+$0.18 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.39B
AABCX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AABCX vs. RLBCX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AABCX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 252B vs. AABCX (2.24B). AABCX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: AABCX (1.68) vs RLBCX (1.57). AABCX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: AABCX (31 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). AABCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). AABCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). AABCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: AABCX (0) vs RLBCX (250). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.52 vs. AABCX (1.39). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 39.59 vs. AABCX (17.48).
| AABCX | RLBCX | AABCX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.89 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.89 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.759 | 7.917 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.24B | 252B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.68 | 1.57 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.39 | 7.52 | 18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.52 | 34.01 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.48 | 39.59 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.06 | 62.14 | 36% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement