Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AABCX vs RLBEX
AABCX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts AABCX vs RLBEX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal C
Price$15.99
Change+$0.04 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.22B
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$36.74
Change+$0.07 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets251.3B
AABCX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AABCX vs. RLBEX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AABCX is a Buy and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 251B vs. AABCX (2.22B). RLBEX pays higher dividends than AABCX: RLBEX (1.83) vs AABCX (1.68). AABCX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: AABCX (31 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). AABCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.59). AABCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBEX (44.00). AABCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBEX: AABCX (0) vs RLBEX (250). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.65 vs. AABCX (-1.68). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 38.58 vs. AABCX (14.16).
| AABCX | RLBEX | AABCX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.59 | 285% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.59 | 285% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.699 | 7.858 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.22B | 251B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.68 | 1.83 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.68 | 5.65 | -30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.29 | 35.22 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.16 | 38.58 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.78 | 63.99 | 29% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement