Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AABCX vs RLBFX
AABCX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts AABCX vs RLBFX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal C
Price$15.99
Change+$0.04 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.22B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$36.87
Change+$0.07 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets251.3B
AABCX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AABCX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AABCX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 251B vs. AABCX (2.22B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than AABCX: RLBFX (2.10) vs AABCX (1.68). AABCX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: AABCX (31 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). AABCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). AABCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). AABCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: AABCX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.97 vs. AABCX (-1.68). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.37 vs. AABCX (14.16).
| AABCX | RLBFX | AABCX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.29 | 579% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.29 | 579% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.699 | 8.017 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.22B | 251B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.68 | 2.10 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.68 | 5.97 | -28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.29 | 36.30 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.16 | 40.37 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.78 | 64.89 | 29% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers