Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AABCX vs RLBFX
AABCX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts AABCX vs RLBFX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal C
Price$16.47
Change-$0.07 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.33B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$38.78
Change-$0.16 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets263.89B
AABCX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AABCX vs. RLBFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AABCX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 264B vs. AABCX (2.33B). AABCX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: AABCX (2.73) vs RLBFX (1.97). AABCX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: AABCX (31 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). AABCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). AABCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). AABCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: AABCX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.13 vs. AABCX (1.09). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.76 vs. AABCX (12.11).
| AABCX | RLBFX | AABCX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.29 | 579% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.29 | 579% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.810 | 14.008 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.33B | 264B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.73 | 1.97 | 139% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.09 | 9.13 | 12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.72 | 41.78 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.11 | 39.76 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.50 | 73.89 | 37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement