Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AABCX vs RLBFX
AABCX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts AABCX vs RLBFX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal C
Price$16.14
Change+$0.06 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.24B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$37.24
Change+$0.12 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.99B
AABCX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AABCX vs. RLBFX commentary
Aug 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AABCX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 253B vs. AABCX (2.24B). AABCX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: AABCX (2.49) vs RLBFX (2.08). AABCX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: AABCX (31 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). AABCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). AABCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). AABCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: AABCX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.48 vs. AABCX (3.69). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.77 vs. AABCX (13.23).
| AABCX | RLBFX | AABCX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.29 | 579% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.29 | 579% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.494 | 9.101 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.24B | 253B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.49 | 2.08 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.69 | 10.48 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.84 | 32.76 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.23 | 38.77 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.22 | 68.01 | 33% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers