Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AABCX vs RLBFX
AABCX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts AABCX vs RLBFX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal C
Price$15.60
Change-$0.03 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.17B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$35.83
Change-$0.04 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets243.73B
AABCX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AABCX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AABCX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 244B vs. AABCX (2.17B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than AABCX: RLBFX (2.18) vs AABCX (2.00). AABCX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: AABCX (31 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). AABCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). AABCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). AABCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: AABCX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.28 vs. AABCX (-0.18). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.31 vs. AABCX (13.22).
| AABCX | RLBFX | AABCX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.29 | 579% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.29 | 579% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.579 | 4.702 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.17B | 244B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.00 | 2.18 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.18 | 7.28 | -3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.99 | 23.88 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.22 | 36.31 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.83 | 61.89 | 29% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement