Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AABCX vs RLBFX
AABCX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts AABCX vs RLBFX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal C
Price$16.65
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.33B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$38.69
Change-$0.01 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets263.25B
AABCX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AABCX vs. RLBFX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AABCX is a StrongBuy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. AABCX (2.33B). AABCX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: AABCX (2.44) vs RLBFX (2.05). AABCX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: AABCX (31 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). AABCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). AABCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). AABCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: AABCX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.77 vs. AABCX (2.41). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.27 vs. AABCX (17.52).
| AABCX | RLBFX | AABCX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.29 | 579% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.29 | 579% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.304 | 13.349 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.33B | 263B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.44 | 2.05 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.41 | 9.77 | 25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.79 | 44.38 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.52 | 44.27 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.86 | 82.55 | 39% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement