Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AABCX vs RLBFX
AABCX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts AABCX vs RLBFX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal C
Price$15.79
Change-$0.03 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.21B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$36.21
Change-$0.04 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets248.02B
AABCX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AABCX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AABCX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 248B vs. AABCX (2.21B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than AABCX: RLBFX (2.18) vs AABCX (2.00). AABCX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: AABCX (31 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). AABCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). AABCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). AABCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: AABCX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.71 vs. AABCX (0.12). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.43 vs. AABCX (17.91).
| AABCX | RLBFX | AABCX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.29 | 579% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.29 | 579% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.838 | 6.084 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.21B | 248B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.00 | 2.18 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.12 | 6.71 | 2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.23 | 32.66 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.91 | 43.43 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.71 | 63.63 | 29% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement