Ad is loading...
AABFX vs BKMIX
AABFX vs BKMIX Comparison
Open Charts AABFX vs BKMIX
Thrivent Dynamic Allocation A
Price$13.40
Change+$0.39 (+3.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets387.82M
BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Portfolio K
Price$9.90
Change+$0.20 (+2.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.85B
AABFX vs BKMIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AABFX vs. BKMIX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AABFX is a Buy and BKMIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BKMIX has more cash in the bank: 9.85B vs. AABFX (388M). BKMIX pays higher dividends than AABFX: BKMIX (6.05) vs AABFX (2.88). AABFX was incepted earlier than BKMIX: AABFX (27 years) vs BKMIX (8 years). AABFX (1.03) is less costly to investors than BKMIX (0.62). BKMIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. AABFX (77.00). AABFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BKMIX: AABFX (2000) vs BKMIX (5000000). BKMIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.64 vs. AABFX (-1.61). AABFX (28.70) and BKMIX (27.52) have equivalent 5 years return.
| AABFX | BKMIX | AABFX / BKMIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.52 | 190% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.62 | 166% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.746 | -2.473 | 192% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 388M | 9.85B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.88 | 6.05 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.61 | 2.64 | -61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.63 | 8.08 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.70 | 27.52 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.52 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...