Ad is loading...
AABFX vs HBLSX
AABFX vs HBLSX Comparison
Open Charts AABFX vs HBLSX
Thrivent Balanced Income Plus A
Price$14.03
Change-$0.05 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets417.77M
Hartford Balanced Income R4
Price$14.68
Change-$0.02 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.12B
AABFX vs HBLSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AABFX vs. HBLSX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AABFX is a Buy and HBLSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. AABFX (418M). HBLSX pays higher dividends than AABFX: HBLSX (3.25) vs AABFX (2.88). AABFX was incepted earlier than HBLSX: AABFX (27 years) vs HBLSX (15 years). AABFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. HBLSX (57.00). HBLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than AABFX: HBLSX (0) vs AABFX (2000). AABFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.28 vs. HBLSX (6.48). AABFX return over 5 years is better than : 17.71 vs. HBLSX (8.52).
| AABFX | HBLSX | AABFX / HBLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.036 | 2.945 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 418M | 12.1B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.88 | 3.25 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.28 | 6.48 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.32 | 4.38 | 235% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.71 | 8.52 | 208% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.10 | 33.13 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers