Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AABFX vs HBLSX
AABFX vs HBLSX Comparison
Open Charts AABFX vs HBLSX
Thrivent Dynamic Allocation A
Price$13.88
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets410.28M
Hartford Balanced Income R4
Price$14.39
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.63B
AABFX vs HBLSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AABFX vs. HBLSX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AABFX is a Buy and HBLSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 11.6B vs. AABFX (410M). HBLSX pays higher dividends than AABFX: HBLSX (3.30) vs AABFX (2.88). AABFX was incepted earlier than HBLSX: AABFX (27 years) vs HBLSX (15 years). AABFX (1.03) is less costly to investors than HBLSX (0.96). AABFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. HBLSX (61.00). HBLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than AABFX: HBLSX (0) vs AABFX (2000). AABFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.43 vs. HBLSX (1.78). AABFX return over 5 years is better than : 32.16 vs. HBLSX (16.51).
| AABFX | HBLSX | AABFX / HBLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.96 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.96 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.624 | 1.837 | 88% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 410M | 11.6B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.88 | 3.30 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.43 | 1.78 | 249% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.16 | 8.42 | 204% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.16 | 16.51 | 195% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.45 | 31.72 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers