Ad is loading...
AABFX vs HBLSX
AABFX vs HBLSX Comparison
Open Charts AABFX vs HBLSX
Thrivent Balanced Income Plus A
Price$13.92
Change+$0.02 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Hartford Balanced Income R4
Price$14.37
Change+$0.08 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
AABFX vs HBLSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AABFX vs. HBLSX commentary
Dec 24, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AABFX is a Buy and HBLSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 12B vs. AABFX (415M). HBLSX pays higher dividends than AABFX: HBLSX (3.25) vs AABFX (2.88). AABFX was incepted earlier than HBLSX: AABFX (27 years) vs HBLSX (15 years). AABFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. HBLSX (57.00). HBLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than AABFX: HBLSX (0) vs AABFX (2000). AABFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.04 vs. HBLSX (3.25). AABFX return over 5 years is better than : 17.42 vs. HBLSX (7.79).
| AABFX | HBLSX | AABFX / HBLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.528 | 2.409 | 271% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 415M | 12B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.88 | 3.25 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.04 | 3.25 | 217% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.98 | -1.27 | -314% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.42 | 7.79 | 224% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.14 | 30.68 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...