Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AABHX vs FSNOX
AABHX vs FSNOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSNOX has more cash in the bank: 12.9B vs. AABHX (59.3M). AABHX pays higher dividends than FSNOX: AABHX (5.41) vs FSNOX (2.39). AABHX was incepted earlier than FSNOX: AABHX (5 years) vs FSNOX (8 years). FSNOX (0.49) is less costly to investors than AABHX (0.27). AABHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. FSNOX (14.00). AABHX (0) and FSNOX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. AABHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.09 vs. FSNOX (7.90).
| AABHX | FSNOX | AABHX / FSNOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.49 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.27 | 0.49 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.792 | 10.078 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 59.3M | 12.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.41 | 2.39 | 227% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.09 | 7.90 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.69 | 29.24 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 2.64 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers