Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AABHX vs FSNOX
AABHX vs FSNOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSNOX has more cash in the bank: 13B vs. AABHX (54.8M). AABHX pays higher dividends than FSNOX: AABHX (5.44) vs FSNOX (2.41). AABHX was incepted earlier than FSNOX: AABHX (5 years) vs FSNOX (8 years). FSNOX (0.49) is less costly to investors than AABHX (0.27). AABHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. FSNOX (14.00). AABHX (0) and FSNOX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. AABHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.76 vs. FSNOX (7.22).
| AABHX | FSNOX | AABHX / FSNOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.49 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.27 | 0.49 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.206 | 10.846 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 54.8M | 13B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.44 | 2.41 | 225% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.76 | 7.22 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.20 | 36.85 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 6.91 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement