AABVF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
3.47M
ASXSF
Price
$0.30
Change
+$0.02 (+7.14%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
8.61M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AABVF vs ASXSF

Header iconAABVF vs ASXSF Comparison
Open Charts AABVF vs ASXSFBanner chart's image
Aberdeen International
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$30K
Capitalization3.47M
Elysee Development
Price$0.30
Change+$0.02 (+7.14%)
Volume$400
Capitalization8.61M
AABVF vs ASXSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AABVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ASXSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AABVF vs. ASXSF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AABVF is a Buy and ASXSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (AABVF: $0.02 vs. ASXSF: $0.30)
Brand notoriety: AABVF and ASXSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AABVF: 284% vs. ASXSF: 17%
Market capitalization -- AABVF: $3.47M vs. ASXSF: $8.61M
AABVF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $3.47M. ASXSF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $8.61M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AABVF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileASXSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AABVF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ASXSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ASXSF is a better buy in the long-term than AABVF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AABVF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ASXSF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AABVF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • ASXSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AABVF is a better buy in the short-term than ASXSF.

Price Growth

AABVF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.53% price change this week, while ASXSF (@Investment Managers) price change was -0.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.27%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.32% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ASXSF($8.61M) has a higher market cap than AABVF($3.47M). ASXSF YTD gains are higher at: 45.288 vs. AABVF (-8.314). AABVF has less debt than ASXSF: AABVF (42.7K) vs ASXSF (1.82M). ASXSF has higher revenues than AABVF: ASXSF (-6.38K) vs AABVF (-7.29M).
AABVFASXSFAABVF / ASXSF
Capitalization3.47M8.61M40%
EBITDAN/A2.46M-
Gain YTD-8.31445.288-18%
P/E RatioN/A3.46-
Revenue-7.29M-6.38K114,269%
Total CashN/A13.3M-
Total Debt42.7K1.82M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AABVF vs ASXSF: Fundamental Ratings
AABVF
ASXSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9684
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9948
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8443
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
87100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ASXSF's Valuation (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AABVF (84). This means that ASXSF’s stock grew significantly faster than AABVF’s over the last 12 months.

ASXSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as AABVF (100). This means that ASXSF’s stock grew similarly to AABVF’s over the last 12 months.

ASXSF's SMR Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AABVF (99). This means that ASXSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AABVF’s over the last 12 months.

ASXSF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AABVF (84). This means that ASXSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AABVF’s over the last 12 months.

AABVF's P/E Growth Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as ASXSF (100). This means that AABVF’s stock grew similarly to ASXSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AABVFASXSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AABVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ASXSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QNST15.950.17
+1.08%
QuinStreet
FLUT295.282.90
+0.99%
Flutter Entertainment plc
RUSHA58.24-0.28
-0.48%
Rush Enterprises
VCIG0.72-0.01
-1.40%
VCI Global Limited
ELMD24.47-0.44
-1.77%
Electromed

AABVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AABVF and ASXSF have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AABVF and ASXSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AABVF
1D Price
Change %
AABVF100%
N/A
ASXSF - AABVF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BMNM - AABVF
6%
Poorly correlated
+3.03%
AMDUF - AABVF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AJMPF - AABVF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SII - AABVF
0%
Poorly correlated
+1.60%
More

ASXSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ASXSF and RESCU have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ASXSF and RESCU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ASXSF
1D Price
Change %
ASXSF100%
N/A
RESCU - ASXSF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AGFMF - ASXSF
18%
Poorly correlated
-0.64%
AABVF - ASXSF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AHFCF - ASXSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AMDUF - ASXSF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More